Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 20;13(2):509–520. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00405-x

Table 4.

Conditional Discrimination training best practices and recommended protocols for emergent responding training systems with GOOGLE SLIDESTM and GOOGLE FORMSTM

Conditional Discrimination Best Practicesa SlidesTM FormsTM
Auditory stimulus used as sample Yes Yes
Counterbalanced presentation order and position of sample and comparison stimuli Yes Yes
Fast-paced trial presentation Yes Yes
At least three comparison stimuli in an array Yes Yes
Immediate trial-by-trial reinforcement/feedback during training Yes No
Trials prepared out of view of the learnerb N/A N/A
A different sample stimulus presented every trial Yes Yes
Observing response required Yes No
Basic learner and readiness skills taught prior to using MTSc N/A N/A
Errorless teaching or prompt-fading methods used Yes Yesd
Recommended Protocols for Emergent Responding Training Systemse
Three or more equivalence classes Yes Yes
Three or more members in an equivalence class Yes Yes
One-to-many training structure Yes Yes
Simple-to-complex training protocol Yes Yes
Selection-based responses taught Yes Yes
Topography-based responses taught Nof Yes
Test for emergent selection-based responses without feedback Yes Yes
Test for emergent topography-based responses without feedback Nof Yes
Training/testing mastery criteria to facilitate emergent responding Yes Yes

aGreen (2001), Grow and LeBlanc (2013), and MacDonald and Langer (2018).

bNot applicable for a computer-based system.

cNot applicable for typically developing learners.

dPrompting procedures can be implemented; however, they cannot be automated.

eArntzen (2012); Brodsky and Fienup (2018); Critchfield and Twyman (2014); Fienup, Wright, and Fields (2018); Pilgrim (2020); Rehfeldt (2011); Reyes-Giordano and Fienup (2015); and Saunders and Green (1999).

fTopography-based responses can be taught and tested; however, responses cannot be recorded by the system and must be directly observed by the trainer