Table 4.
Point assignment and prognostic score in nomogram.
| Variables | Score | Estimated 3-year CIF (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| 20-24 | 0 | |
| 25-29 | 1 | |
| 30-34 | 3 | |
| 35-39 | 4 | |
| 40-44 | 6 | |
| 45-49 | 8 | |
| 50-54 | 13 | |
| 55-59 | 23 | |
| 60-64 | 34 | |
| 65-69 | 39 | |
| 70-74 | 50 | |
| 75-79 | 72 | |
| >=80 | 98 | |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 0 | |
| Male | 6 | |
| Race | ||
| White | 0 | |
| Black | 3 | |
| Other | 0 | |
| Marriage | ||
| Married | 0 | |
| Divorced | 19 | |
| Single | 26 | |
| Unknown | 8 | |
| Location | ||
| Colon | 6 | |
| Rectum | 0 | |
| Histology | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 8 | |
| Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 29 | |
| Signet ring cell carcinoma | 0 | |
| Differential grade | ||
| Well | 6 | |
| Moderate | 0 | |
| Poor/Undifferentiated | 39 | |
| T classificationa | ||
| T1 | 100 | |
| T2 | 0 | |
| T3 | 1 | |
| T4 | 4 | |
| N classificationa | ||
| N0 | 0 | |
| N1 | 0 | |
| N2 | 2 | |
| CEA | ||
| Negative | 0 | |
| Positive | 48 | |
| Unknown | 48 | |
| Total prognostic score (3-year CIF) | ||
| 277 | 0.05 | |
| 219 | 0.20 | |
| 166 | 0.40 | |
| 111 | 0.60 | |
| 77 | 0.70 | |
| 33 | 0.80 |
CIF, Cumulative Incidence Function.
a
T classification was classified as T1, T2, T3, T4 subgroups and N classification was classified as N0, N1, N2 according to the 7th AJCC TNM staging system.