Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;58(7):e00135-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00135-20

TABLE 5.

Comparison of BioFire PN panel and phenotypic results for detection of carbapenemase and ESBL-producing organismsa

Specimen PN panel bacterial target detected PN panel resistance marker detected Culture result Phenotypic susceptibility (method)
B-08-008 A. baumannii, 106 blaKPC A. baumannii, “few” Carbapenem resistant (MIC)
K. pneumoniae, 104 ND NA
B-03-008 E. cloacae, 106 blaKPC E. cloacae, ≥105 Carbapenem resistant (MIC), ESBL positive (Etest ESBL)
P. aeruginosa, ≥107 P. aeruginosa, ≥105 Phenotypic tests not performed
B-01-015 E. cloacae, 104 blaNDM E. cloacae, 103 Carbapenem susceptible (MIC), ESBL negative (BMD)
B-08-056 P. aeruginosa, 106 blaCTX-M P. aeruginosa, “moderate” Carbapenem resistant (MIC)
B-01-040 K. pneumoniae, 106 ND K. pneumoniae, 104 Carbapenem susceptible (MIC), ESBL positive (BMD)
B-05-012 E. cloacae, 105 ND E. cloacae, ≥105 Carbapenem not tested, ESBL positive (KB)
B-08-024 P. aeruginosa, ≥107 ND P. aeruginosa, “few” Carbapenem resistant (MIC)
B-08-027 K. oxytoca, 104 ND K. oxytoca, “rare” Carbapenem susceptible (MIC), ESBL positive (MIC)
B-08-029 P. aeruginosa, ≥107 ND P. aeruginosa, “few” Carbapenem resistant (MIC)
B-08-053 P. aeruginosa, ≥107 ND P. aeruginosa, “moderate” Carbapenem resistant (MIC)
a

ND, not detected; KB, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test; BMD, broth microdilution test; Etest ESBL, Etest ESBL test strip.