Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Predict Intell Med. 2019 Oct 10;11843:1–10. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32281-6_1

Table 3:

TADPOLE performance metric formulas and definitions for the terms.

Formula Definitions
mAUC=2L(L1)i=2Lj=1iA^(ci,cj) ni, nj – {number of points from class i and j. Sij – {the sum of the ranks of the class i test points, after ranking all the class i and j data points in increasing likelihood of belonging to class i, L – number of data points
BCA=12Li=1L[TPTP+FN+TNTN+FP] TPi, FPi, TNi, FNi the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives for class i L number of data points
MAE=1Ni=1N|M˜iMi| Mi is the actual value in individual i in future data. M˜i is the participant’s best guess at Mi and N is the number of data points
WES=Σi=1NC˜i|M˜iMi|i=1NC˜i Mi, M˜i and N defined as above. C˜i=(C+C)1, where is the 50% confidence interval
CPA=|ACP0.5| actual coverage probability (ACP) - the proportion of measurements that fall within the 50% confidence interval.