Table 3.
Patient No. | Age (yr) | Location | Initial US |
Follow-up US |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shape | Echogenicity | Vascularity grade | Shape | Echogenicity | Vascularity grade | |||
1 | 17 | Right | Elliptical | Hypoechoic | 2 | Oblong | Heterogeneously hypoechoic | 0 |
2 | 18 | Left | Elliptical | Heterogeneously hypoechoic | 2 | Oblong | Heterogeneously hypoechoic | 0 |
3 | 16 | Right | Elliptical | Hypoechoic | 2 | Oblong | Heterogeneously hypoechoic | 0 |
4 | 14 | Right | Elliptical | Hypoechoic | 2 | Oblong | Heterogeneously hypoechoic | 0 |
5 | 14 | Right | Elliptical | Heterogeneously hypoechoic | 2 | Oblong | Heterogeneously hypoechoic | 0 |
6 | 18 | Right | Elliptical | Hypoechoic | 2 | Elliptical | Heterogeneously hyperechoic | 1 |
7 | 24 | Right | Elliptical | Hypoechoic | 2 | Elliptical | Heterogeneously hyperechoic | 0 |
8 | 15 | Right | Elliptical | Hypoechoic | 2 | Oblong | Heterogeneously hypoechoic | 1 |
Left | Elliptical | Hypoechoic | 2 | Oblong | Heterogeneously hypoechoic | 1 |
Vascularity was graded using a 3-point scale: 0, decreased vascularity compared with the contralateral normal testis; 1, similar vascularity to the contralateral normal testis; and 2, increased vascularity compared with the contralateral normal testis.