Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Cancer. 2020 Mar 27;6(5):380–391. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.02.010

Table 1.

Current methods for evaluating MGMT status

Parameter evaluated Method Description Reference
Promoter methylation Non-quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) DNA is treated with bisulfite, which converts unmethylated cytosine to uracil without modifying 5-methylcytosine. Using primers that are specific to methylated or unmethylated sequences, PCR is performed and analyzed by gel electrophoresis to provide qualitative results [4, 6]
Quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) qMSP is similar to the non-quantitative MSP assay but provides quantitative results after normalization to an unmethylated gene [6, 40]
Pyrosequencing A method of DNA sequencing, also based on bisulfite conversion and PCR, offering a quantitative determination of methylation of each individual CpG site sequenced [13]
Methylation-sensitive multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MPLA) Uses methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes to give semi-quantitative results for methylation status [4, 13]
Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip Array Genome-wide methylation profiling of 850,000 CpG sites, including the MGMT genomic region [6]
mRNA expression Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) Measurement of MGMT transcript expression [13, 43]
Protein expression Immunohistochemistry Tumor cells with nuclear staining are counted as MGMT-positive, and the percentage of positive cells is assessed to determine MGMT status [13, 50]
Protein activity Enzymatic assays Sample is incubated with 3H-labeled O6 methyl-guanine, and the transfer of 3H-labeled methyl groups to the MGMT protein is measured by isolation of the 3H-labeled MGMT molecules [4, 40]