Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 30;127(4):524–561. doi: 10.1037/rev0000181

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Inputs and simulations from blocked input 3.0 and 3.1. A–B. In the most straightforward generalization from blocked input 2.0, we assume in blocked input 3.0 that the transient visual signals associated with signal onset are the same size as the original fixation inputs in blocked input 2.0 (discontinuous blue line). Blocked input 3.1 assumes that the transient activity from the signal is larger (in this case three times higher) than the baseline fixation amplitude (continuous blue line). C. Simulated RT for blocked input 3.0 shows some dip, but this remains very shallow. D. The stop condition for blocked input 3.0 is the same as for blocked input 2.0. E–F. Simulated RTs for blocked input 3.1 now show a clear dip and recovery as expected in the signal-ignore condition (E), while still capturing the signal-stop condition (F).