Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 1 (FSHD1) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorder, associated with reduction of tandemly arrayed repetitive DNA elements D4Z4 (DRA), at 4q35. Few cases, especially carriers of 1-3 DRA show a syndromic form. Anecdotally the association of FSHD with multiple sclerosis (MS) is reported. Herein we report a 33 years old Caucasian with a molecular diagnosis of FSHD1 with classical phenotype (clinical category A2) and concomitant white matter lesions suggestive of MS. White matter lesions in patients with FSHD have often been described but rarely investigated in order to evaluate a possible diagnosis of MS. We think that MS and FSHD remain clearly distinct diseases, but growing evidences show a widespread and variable activation of the immune system in patients suffering from FSHD probably an hypotheses on a potential common pathogenetic mechanism between these two disorders could should be better investigated.
Key words: autoimmunity, myopathy, central nervous system
Introduction
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorder characterized by progressive weakness of muscle in the face, shoulder girdle and arms. FSHD1 has been associated with reduction of tandemly arrayed repetitive DNA elements, D4Z4, at 4q35. Alleles with 1-3 D4Z4 repeats are generally associated with a syndromic form with extramuscular manifestations (i.e. central nervous system involvement with mental retardation and hearing loss) 1. To our knowledge, there are only two cases, whose one is an autopsy case 2, of FSHD associated with multiple sclerosis 3. Herein, we report another case of concomitant multiple sclerosis (MS) in a patient with FSHD1.
Case report
We evaluated a 33 years old Caucasian man referring a short episode of blurred vision in right eye occurs five months before and spontaneously resolved in fortnight period. At our visit he informs us that two years ago, over the course of 2-3 weeks, he developed also lower limb hypoesthesia and diplopia. However, he had a previous genetically confirmed diagnosis of FSHD1 (molecular analysis of DNA documented intermediate deletion on 4q35 with 3 D4Z4 repeats). The muscle impairment started in the second decade of life with inability to bury the eyelashes, difficulty in pursing the lips, as well as whistling or puffing out the cheeks, winging of the scapulae and bilateral foot drop. In fact his neurologic examination showed a classic FSHD phenotype (Fig. 1), clinical category A2 4. Anyway, he presented right Babinski sign, moderate impairment of deep sensation and mild spasticity in the lower limbs, too. As there was centre nervous system involvement patient underwent a MRI brain that showed multiple demyelinating lesions both in the supratentorial and infratentorial white matter and several demyelinating lesions of the spinal cord. None of them demonstrated gadolinium enhancement (Fig. 2). White matter brain MRI alterations suggested a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Then visual evoked potentials revealed mild delayed latencies bilaterally. Somatosensory and motor evoked responses both for upper and lower limb were altered 5-7.
Figure 1.

Weakness of lips’ (A) and shoulder muscles (B) configuring a classic clinical phenotype of Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (clinical category A2).
Figure 2.

Axial FLAIR images (A) show multiple demyelinating lesions both in the supratentorial and infratentorial white matter. Sagittal (B) and coronal (C) FLAIR sequence depicts corpus callosum and medulla involvement. Sagittal STIR (D) demonstrates several demyelinating lesions of the spinal cord.
Spinal fluid was acellular with normal protein and glucose level; however, oligoclonal bands were detected in CSF electrophoresis only, but not in the serum. Subsequently, the patient underwent an extensive work-up searching for metabolic, immune-mediated, infectious and vascular disorders that might simulate the working diagnosis of MS and all tests were either negative or normal. Neuropsychological evaluation using standard battery 8,9 showed no abnormalities. On the other hand, nerve conduction studies were within normal limits 10, whereas needle electromyography confirmed a myopathic pattern consistent with his previous diagnosis of FSHD. Finally, the patient fulfilled the Mc Donald criteria for the diagnosis of MS 11. He started a disease modifying treatment with dimetilfumarate and non-pharmacological treatments were applied in an attempt to recover disability 12,13.
Discussion
White matter lesions in patients with FSHD have often been described but rarely investigated or correlated with the clinical and/or laboratory phenotype in order to evaluate a possible diagnosis of multiple sclerosis 14.
An autoptic case and a clinical case of association between FSHD and MS have been described 2,3 and hypotheses on a potential common pathogenetic mechanism between these two different disorders has been proposed. Obviously, MS and FSHD remain clearly distinct diseases, but growing evidences show a widespread and variable activation of the immune system in patients suffering from FSHD. Pathological data in muscle biopsy in FSHD patients are consistent with a significant presence of CD8+ T cells both in perivascular and endomysial infiltrates, together with macrophages. Moreover, an increased percentage of circulating CD14+T-bet+ cells and an increased spontaneous production of IL12/IL23p40, IFNγ, TNFα, IL6 and IL10 by PBMC have been described 15. Furthermore, the presence of demyelinating lesions that have the characteristics of dissemination over time and space suggesting the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, are increasingly noted in patients suffering from other genetically defined muscular diseases.
However, given the high prevalence of multiple sclerosis, we consider that the association between these two entities in our patient is casual. In the presence of signs or symptoms suggestive of involvement of the CNS in a primitively muscular pathology or the occasional finding of lesions of the white matter in the brain MRI, should always orientate a deep diagnostic screening in order to exclude a possible comorbidity with diseases such as multiple sclerosis.
Figures and tables
References
- 1.Nikolic A, Ricci G, Sera F, et al. Clinical expression of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy in carriers of 1-3 D4Z4 reduced alleles: experience of the FSHD Italian National Registry. BMJ Open 2016;6:e007798 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007798 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mishra SK, Currier RD, Smith EE, et al. Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy associated with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 1984;41:570-1. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1984.04050170120032 10.1001/archneur.1984.04050170120032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parissis D, Ioannidis P, Bakirtzis C, et al. Muscular dystrophy in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Another “double-trouble”? Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015;4:342-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2015.06.007 10.1016/j.msard.2015.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ricci G, Ruggiero L, Vercelli L, et al. A novel clinical tool to classify facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy phenotypes. J Neurol 2016;263:1204-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8123-2 10.1007/s00415-016-8123-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Iodice R, Dubbioso R, Topa A, et al. Electrophysiological characterization of adult-onset Niemann-Pick type C disease. J Neurol Sci 2015;348:262-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2014.12.005 10.1016/j.jns.2014.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Iodice R, Carotenuto A, Dubbioso R, et al. Multimodal evoked potentials follow up in multiple sclerosis patients under fingolimod therapy. J Neurol Sci 2016;365:143-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.04.026 10.1016/j.jns.2016.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dubbioso R, Pellegrino G, Antenora A, et al. The effect of cerebellar degeneration on human sensori-motor plasticity. Brain Stimul 2015;8:1144-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.012 10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dubbioso R, Moretta P, Manganelli F, et al. Executive functions are impaired in heterozygote patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy. J Neurol 2012;259 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6255-y 10.1007/s00415-011-6255-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dubbioso R, Ranucci G, Esposito M, et al. Subclinical neurological involvement does not develop if Wilson’s disease is treated early. Park Relat Disord 2016;24:15-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.01.024 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.01.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manganelli F, Pisciotta C, Dubbioso R, et al. Electrophysiological characterisation in hereditary spastic paraplegia type 5. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.10.025 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.10.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thompson PM, Banwell B, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Iodice R, Dubbioso R, Ruggiero L, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of motor cortex does not ameliorate spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2015;33:487-92. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-150495 10.3233/RNN-150495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Iodice R, Manganelli F, Dubbioso R. The therapeutic use of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis – a review. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2017;35:497-509. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-170735 10.3233/RNN-170735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Quarantelli M, Lanzillo R, Del Vecchio W, et al. Modifications of brain tissue volumes in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Neuroimage 2006;32:1237-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.226 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Frisullo G, Frusciante R, Nociti V, et al. CD8+ T cells in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy patients with inflammatory features at muscle MRI. J Clin Immunol 2011;31:155-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-010-9474-6 10.1007/s10875-010-9474-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
