Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 27;214:30–49. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.07.011

Table 1.

Summary of the advantages and disadvantages of different viral vectors that have been utilized for siRNA delivery

Delivery vector Advantages Disadvantages
Viruses Adenovirus Highly efficient transduction profile111 Immunological responses, nonspecific cell targetting,111 acute toxicity151
AAV Highly efficient transduction profile,111 reduce inflammatory and immune responses152, 153 Requires helper virus,152 small cloning capacity154
Retrovirus High gene transduction Dependence of cell differentiated state,155 insertion into host genomes115
Lentivirus High gene transduction, cell differentiated state independence156 Insertion into host genomes115
Lipids Cationic Good transfection efficiency, electrostatic interactions with siRNA115 Poor stability, cellular toxicity, immune response elicitation106, 157
Neutral Reduced cytotoxicity115 Reduced ability to complex with siRNA115
Nanoparticles Charge variable, complex formation prior to administration, neutralized at physiological pH, reduced toxicity and immunological responses, increased membrane destabilizing capacity, higher endosomolytic activity110, 115, 158 Synthetic challenges
Polymers Polycations Modifiable size115 Weaker interactions with siRNA115
Nanoparticles Biocompatible, biodegradable, synthetic diversity115 Large surface area causes aggregation159
Peptides PLL Electrostatic interactions with siRNA, synthetic diversity120 Toxicity, nonspecific binding, poor endosomal escape102, 160, 161
CPPs Synthetic diversity, covalent and noncovalent complex formation120 Membrane permeability challenges, poor endosomal escape120, 162