Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jan 9;27(2):179–192. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2417

Table 3. Reasons for Inclusion and Exclusion of Hypothesised Linguistic Features.

Linguistic Feature Reason for Inclusion/Exclusion
Included
           Negative emotiona Theoretical basis and empirical evidence
           Positive emotiona Theoretical basis and empirical evidence
           First-person singular pronouna Theoretical basis and empirical evidence
           Absolutista Theoretical basis and empirical evidence
Excluded
           Causationa
  • Potentially affected by the study context

  • Potentially reflective of CFS/ME or depression

  • A less conclusive evidence-base

  • Available linguistic data for personality disorder only

           Insighta
  • Potentially reflective of CFS or depression

  • A less conclusive evidence-base

  • Available linguistic data for personality disorder only

           Discrepancya
  • A less conclusive evidence-base

  • Available linguistic data for personality disorder only

           Past-focusa
  • Potentially reflective of CFS or depression

  • Available linguistic data for personality disorder only

           Future-focusa
  • Potentially reflective of CFS or depression

  • Available linguistic data for personality disorder only

           Achieveb
  • Potentially reflective of CFS or depression

  • A lack of previous evidence

Note. Linguistic features were taken from the LIWC2015 (Pennebaker et al., 2015) and absolutist (Al-Mosaiwi & Johnstone, 2018) dictionaries.

a

Identified deductively.

b

Identified inductively.