Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jan 9;27(2):179–192. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2417

Table 7. Percentage Match between Linguistic Coding Scheme and RCADS Categorisation of Depression.

RCADS

        Nonea
        n (%)
        Possiblea
        n (%)
        Probablea
        n (%)

Linguistic coding scheme Primary analysisb Non-case         1 (6)         4 (25)         5 (31)
Borderline case         0 (0)         1 (6)         4 (25)
Case         0 (0)         0 (0)         1 (6)

        None
        n (%)
        Possible
        n (%)
        Probable
        n (%)

Sensitivity analysisb Non-case         1 (6)         5 (31)         8 (50)
Borderline case         0 (0)         0 (0)         1 (6)
Case         0 (0)         0 (0)         1 (6)

Note. RCADS = Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale.

a

None = RCADS t-score ≤ 64; Possible = RCADS t-score 65-69; Probable = RCADS t-score ≥ 70).

b

Primary analysis = first ≤ four messages of each participant; Sensitivity analysis = all messages sent by each participant.