Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 14;28(8):3847–3854. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05228-8

Table 3.

The association of relationship status on the importance of and perceived satisfaction with sex life in the different study groups and according to couple relationship status; age groups combined according to Finnish nationwide HeSSup cohort study. Analysis of covariance (ANOVA) with pairwise comparison with Dunnett’s adjustment

Importance of sex life Satisfaction with sex life
Couple relationship No couple relationship Couple relationship No couple relationship
N Mean 95% CI N Mean 95% CI N Mean 95% CI N Mean 95% CI
Breast cancer 52 3.63 3.23–4.04 14 4.21 3.26–5.17 52 3.62 3.18–4.05 13 4.31 3.25–5.37
Mental depression 385 3.45 3.30–3.59 223 4.05 3.81–4.29 384 3.45 3.29–3.61 219 4.07 3.82–4.33
Arterial hypertension 670 3.20 3.09–3.31 197 3.88 3.62–4.13 671 3.14 3.02–3.26 193 3.69 3.42–3.97
Healthy controls 6909 2.96* 2.93–3.00 2346 3.27 3.19–3.34 6908 2.94** 2.90–2.98 2308 3.86 3.78–3.94
Total 8016 2780 8015 2733

*The only significant difference between BC and other groups was found in the subgroup of people living in couple relationship (BC vs. healthy controls, Dunnett-adjusted p = 0.02)

**The only significant difference between BC and other groups was found in the subgroup of people living in couple relationship (BC vs. healthy controls, Dunnett-adjusted p = 0.005)