Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 27;23(4):347–358. doi: 10.1007/s11102-020-01038-y

Table 1.

Acro-TSQ score descriptive summary, second study

Acro-TSQ scale Statistic Screening
N = 82
Baseline
N = 81
Week 26
N = 77
Symptom interference Mean 72 78 78
Median 75 81 94
SD 25 24 27
Range 19–100 19–100 0–100
Floor (n, %) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
Ceiling (n, %) 26 (32%) 35 (43%) 38 (49%)
Treatment convenience Mean 67 68 70
Median 67 71 71
SD 21 21 18
Range 4–100 17–100 17–100
Floor (n, %) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Ceiling (n, %) 4 (5%) 5 (6%) 1 (1%)
Injection site interferencea Mean 84 85
Median 88 88
SD 20 18
Range 13–100 38–100
Floor (n, %) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Ceiling (n, %) 39 (48%) 40 (49%)
GI interference Mean 80 84 83
Median 92 92 100
SD 24 21 23
Range 0–100 17–100 25–100
Floor (n, %) 1 (1%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Ceiling (n, %) 37 (45%) 39 (48%) 41 (53%)
Treatment satisfaction Mean 61 61 58
Median 61 61 61
SD 20 19 25
Range 0–100 14–100 0–100
Floor (n, %) 1 (1%) 0 (0%) 3 (4%)
Ceiling (n, %) 2 (2%) 3 (4%) 3 (4%)
Emotional reaction Mean 80 82 84
Median 83 83 92
SD 22 20 21
Range 0–100 0–100 25–100
Floor (n, %) 2 (2%) 2 (3%) 0 (0%)
Ceiling (n, %) 23 (28%) 22 (27%) 33 (43%)

Floor is most symptomatic; Ceiling Least Symptomatic. Lower scores indicate greater interference/lower satisfaction; higher score indicate less interference/higher satisfaction

GI gastrointestinal, SD standard deviation

aInjection site interference scale was not administered at week 26