Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 14;57(8):3071–3080. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04340-6

Table 2.

Regression coefficients estimated for TPC and DPPH values of Argel (Solenostemma argel) leaf extracts

Factor TPC DPPH
Coefficient estimate Standard error 95% CI low 95% CI high Coefficient estimate Standard error 95% CI low 95% CI high
Intercept
β0 Linear 68.62a 0.3847 67.71 69.53 85.69a 1.30 82.62 88.77
β1 1.95a 0.3041 1.24 2.67 −1.65 1.03 −4.08 0.7839
β2 0.7078 0.3041 −0.011 1.43 2.00 1.03 −0.4366 4.43
β3 2.66a 0.3041 1.94 3.38 −3.30a 1.03 −5.73 −0.8655
Interaction
β12 0.7883 0.4301 −0.228 1.81 0.5208 1.46 −2.92 3.96
β13 −1.13a 0.4301 −2.14 −0.1090 1.39 1.46 −2.05 4.83
β23 −0.3700 0.4301 −1.39 0.6470 3.82a 1.46 0.3784 7.26
Quadratic
β11 0.7850 0.4192 −0.206 1.78 1.34 1.42 −2.02 4.69
β22 −0.6145 0.4192 −1.61 0.3768 −2.14 1.42 −5.49 1.22
β33 −0.6306 0.4192 −1.62 0.3607 −3.00 1.42 −6.36 0.3504
R2 0.9530 0.8214
Adjusted R2 0.8925 0.5918
F probability value 0.001 0.053
Lack of fit probability 0.087 0.073

TPC total phenolic content, DPPH 1,1-diphenyl-1-2-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity, CI confidence interval

ap < 0.05