Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 25;10:10325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67170-8

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparing the DNA hypomethylating activity of DHAs. (a) CEM leukemia cells were treated with different concentrations of decitabine (DAC), 5-azacytidine (5AC) and zebularine (Zeb) for 48 h followed by DNA extraction, DNA bisulfite treatment and DNA pyrosequencing of three CpG sites in the LINE-1 sequence (GenBank accession number X58075) as described under methods. (b) CEM leukemia cells were treated with different concentrations of decitabine (DAC) or RG-108 for 48 h followed by DNA extraction, DNA bisulfite treatment and DNA pyrosequencing of three CpG sites in the LINE-1 sequence as described under methods. (c) CEM leukemia cells were treated with different concentrations of decitabine (DAC), EGCG, 6-thioguanine (6-TG) or PEITC for 48 h followed by DNA extraction, DNA bisulfite treatment and DNA pyrosequencing of three CpG sites in the LINE-1 sequence as described under methods.(d) CEM leukemia cells were treated with different concentrations of decitabine (DAC), 5-azacytidine (5AC) and zebularine (Zeb) for 48 h followed by DNA extraction, DNA bisulfite treatment and DNA pyrosequencing of seven CpG sites in the CDKN2B (p15) sequence as described under methods. In all experiments, data represent the average of duplicates ± SD. *Indicates significant difference from the corresponding control CpG site at p < 0.05.