Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 19;11:827. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00827

TABLE 1.

Description of the 16 environments selected for the analysis.

Environment Groupa Correlation HD/GY α^b α^c β^d
Rea13WW Low –0.06 –0.34 –0.33 –0.32
Cle13LN Low 0.19 0.14 0.10 –0.20
Sau13HN Low 0.25 0.17 0.17 0.01
Gre12WW Low –0.28 –0.64 –0.64 –0.39
Mon12LN Medium 0.50 0.81 0.83 –0.27
Cap12LN Medium 0.51 0.59 0.68 –1.03
Gre13WD Medium –0.54 –0.82 –0.82 0.01
Mon13LN Medium 0.59 1.03 1.03 –0.19
Vra13LN High 0.61 0.73 0.74 0.06
Gre14WD High –0.64 –0.81 –0.82 –0.90
Gre12WD High –0.68 –0.99 –0.98 –0.39
Rec13LN High 0.76 1.91 1.95 0.64
Cap12HN Quadratic 0.38 0.18 0.36 –1.56
Coi12WW Quadratic 0.34 0.50 0.18 –1.58
Lou12LN Quadratic 0.35 0.82 0.39 –1.91
All14LN Quadratic 0.19 0.20 0.19 –2.20

aThe sixteen environments were grouped in four classes according to the kind of relationship between HD and GY: “low,” “medium,” or “high” correlation, or “quadratic” relationship. bα estimates in the 16 environments using model EG_HD. cα and dβ estimates in the 16 environments using model EG_HD2. α and β correspond to the coefficients for the linear and quadratic regressions of GY on HD in each environment. The estimates of α and β presented here were obtained with the full dataset.