Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 13;40(6):1226–1243. doi: 10.1111/risa.13457

Table II.

Mediating Effect of Risk and Benefit Perceptions of Nuclear Power (NP) and Shale Gas (SG): Indirect Effects of Social Influence on Acceptability

Support→RP→ AC Talk→RP→AC Support→BP→AC Talk→BP→AC
NP SG NP SG NP SG NP SG
Indirect effect (SE) 0.04 (0.01) 0.07 (0.01)  −0.02 (0.01) −0.03 (0.01) 0.32 (0.03) 0.27 (0.02) −0.00 (0.02) −0.02 (0.02)
p‐Value <0.001 <0.001 0.02 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.88 0.26
95% CI (0.03–0.06) (0.05–0.10) (−0.03–0.00) (−0.05–0.01) (0.27–0.37) (0.22–0.31) (−0.04–0.03) (−0.06–0.02)

Support = Perceived support toward nuclear power/shale gas in one's network; Talk = talking about risky technologies in one's social network; RP = risk perception; BP = benefit perception; AC = acceptability of nuclear power/shale gas; NP = nuclear power; SG = shale gas.