Table II.
Cause of progestin failure | Potential approaches | Evidence |
---|---|---|
Hormone type | To change the type of progestin | Observational study: NETA and dienogest may have similar effects (Vercellini et al., 2016a). In-vitro studies: different progestins may have different mechanisms of action (Grandi et al., 2016; Nirgianakis et al., 2016; Roth et al., 2019). |
To avoid estrogen association | RCTs did not show meaningful differences between isolated progestins and progestin-estrogen associations (Cheewadhanaraks et al., 2012; Razzi et al., 2007b; Vercellini et al., 2002; Vercellini et al., 2005). Prospective self-control study: for patients who do not respond to COC, changing to NETA may be beneficial (Vercellini et al., 2018c). |
|
To inhibit estrogen synthesis | Non-randomised open-label trials: for patients who fail to respond to progestins, letrozole can be tried as a second line therapy (Ferrero et al., 2009; Ferrero et al., 2014). | |
Therapeutic regimen | To change therapeutic regimen | Systematic review: continuous administration may be better than cyclic regimens (Seracchioli et al., 2009). |
Route of administration | To change the route of administration | RCT: systemic and local progestins may be similar (Carvalho et al., 2018). |
Progesterone resistance | To associate NSAIDs to progestin therapy | No high-quality evidence for NSAIDs effectiveness on endometriosis symptoms, but the association with hormonal treatments might diminish the inflammatory response that boosts progesterone resistance (Brown et al., 2017). |
To associate antioxidants | Multi-centre open-label non comparative clinical trial: antioxidant preparations containing N-acetyl-cysteine may mitigate symptoms (Lete et al., 2018). |
NETA: norethisterone acetate; RCTs: randomised controlled trials; COC: combined oral contraceptive; NSAIDs: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs