Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 24;109(6):1196–1206. doi: 10.1111/apa.15074

Table 3.

Number and proportion of child evaluation steps correctly performed by HEW with ChARM after 2 mo of routine use, by child age group and breathing status

No. Consultation step Observation two (0‐<2 mo) N = 72 Observation two (2‐<12 mo) N = 141 Observation two (12‐59 mo) N = 124 Observation two (fast breathersb) N = 113 Observation two (normal breathersb) N = 222
n % 95% CI n % 95% CI n % 95% CI n % 95% CI n % 95% CI
1 Correct child positiona 70 97.2 93.4‐1.0 121 85.8 80.1‐91.6 82 66.1 57.8‐74.5 102 90.3 84.8‐95.7 171 77.0 71.5‐82.6
2 Correct device positiona 70 97.2 93.4‐1.0 128 90.8 86.0‐95.6 121 97.6 94.9‐1.0 103 91.2 85.9‐96.4 214 96.4 93.9‐98.8
3 Correct belt positiona 72 100.0 95.0‐1.0 141 100.0 97.4‐1.0 124 100.0 97.1‐1.0 113 100.0 96.8‐1.0 222 100.0 98.4‐1.0
4 Correct age groupb 71 98.6 95.9‐1.0 140 99.3 97.9‐1.0 121 97.6 94.9‐1.0 111 98.2 95.8‐1.0 219 98.6 97.1‐1.0
5 Child calm before ChARM attempta 70 97.2 93.4‐1.0 137 97.2 94.4‐99.9 119 96.0 92.5‐99.4 109 96.5 93.1‐99.9 215 96.8 94.5‐99.1
6 Child not eating/feeding during ChARM attempta 72 100.0 95.0‐1.0 140 99.3 97.9‐1.0 124 100.0 97.1‐1.0 112 99.1 97.4‐1.0 222 100.0 98.4‐1.0
7 Child calm during ChARM attempta 72 100.0 95.0‐1.0 138 97.9 95.5‐1.0 122 98.4 96.2‐1.0 111 98.2 95.8‐1.0 219 98.6 97.1‐1.0
8 Correct classification using ChARM (yes/no?)b 72 100.0 95.0‐1.0 140 99.3 97.9‐1 121 99.2c 97.6‐1.0 112 99.1 97.4‐1.0 221 99.5 98.7‐1.0
1‐8 Correct assessment and classification (steps 1‐8) 66 91.7 85.3‐98.1 108 76.6 69.6‐83.6 76 62.3c 53.7‐70.9 90 79.6 72.2‐87.1 160 72.1 71.1‐82.9
a

Based on two research assistants observing the HEW. Where two research assistants disagreed, least conservative estimate was used.

b

Based on comparison of the age group recorded on the screening checklist and the photograph of the ChARM with result displayed.

c

Denominator = 122 due to two 12‐59 mo children not having RR classification with ChARM.