Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 21;141(5):465–475. doi: 10.1111/acps.13158

Table 3.

Associations and interaction effects of CA and PRS‐S with momentary mental state domains

  Association with CA Association with PRS‐S, Interaction between PRS‐S and CA,
b P‐value 95% CI b P‐value 95% CI b P‐value 95% CI
Negative affect 0.13 <0.001, 0.07–0.19 −0.02 0.502 −0.08 to 0.04 0.07 0.013, 0.01–0.13
Positive affect −0.12 <0.001, −0.17 to −0.06 0.08 0.003, 0.03–0.14 −0.05 0.043 −0.10 to −0.00
Subtle psychosis expression 0.18 <0.001, 0.10–0.26 −0.03 0.547 −0.11 to 0.06 0.11 0.007, 0.03–0.19

CA, childhood adversity; CI, confidence interval; PRS‐S, polygenic risk score for schizophrenia.

All analyses were adjusted for age and sex.

Also adjusted for two principal components.

*

Significant after controlling for family‐wise type I error using the Bonferroni method (0.05/3 = 0.0167).