. 2020 Apr 29;46(4):341–353. doi: 10.1002/ab.21893

Table 3.

Standardized regression coefficients of hierarchical regression analyses separately for each cultural group (Step 3 only)A

	Victim blaming	Perpetrator blaming	Perpetrator's crime severity	Rape identification
Turkey
Gender ^a	.17^*	.02	−.01	.09
Reputation threat ^b	.49***	−.28^**	−.19^**	−.08
Religious upbringing	.04	.03	.04	.11
Current religiosity	−.08	.01	−.10	−.17 ^†
Political orientation	−.09	.11	.19^*	.10
Socioeconomic status	−.08	−.04	.07	.05
AWS	.04	−.25 ^†	−.08	−.23 ^†
AMMSA	−.10	.01	−.22^*	−.15
HEI	.46***	−.27^*	−.27^*	−.28^*
R ² (Step 2)	.419	.272	.502	.459
R ² (Step 3)	.500	.299	.528	.487
ΔR ²	.081***	.027^*	.026^*	.029^*
Germany
Gender ^a	−.01	−.10	−.09	.00
Reputation threat ^b	.44***	−.38***	.02	.07
Religious upbringing	.05	−.03	.11	−.01
Current religiosity	.00	−.04	−.18^*	−.09
Political orientation	−.03	−.07	.01	.01
Socioeconomic status	−.01	.03	−.04	−.04
AWS	.05	−.07	−.24^*	−.04
AMMSA	.46***	−.48***	−.32^**	−.29^*
HEI	.07	.07	.03	−.18 ^†
R ² (Step 2)	.483	.414	.331	.186
R ² (Step 3)	.486	.416	.332	.203
ΔR ²	.003	.001	.000	.017 ^†
Britain
Gender ^a	.19^**	−.13 ^†	.11	.13
Reputation threat ^b	.45***	−.42***	−.07	−.06
Religious upbringing	.12	−.12	−.08	‐.07
Current religiosity	−.01	−.11	.03	−.08
Political orientation	−.03	.03	.12	.14
socioeconomic status	−.04	.09	.10	.10
AWS	.03	.03	−.17	−.23^*
AMMSA	.37***	−.31^**	−.36^**	−.31^**
HEI	.17^*	−.10	−.12	−.01
R ² (Step 2)	.531	.398	.326	.311
R² (Step 3)	.547	.404	.334	.312
ΔR ²	.016^*	.006	.008	.000

Abbreviations: AMMSA, Aceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale; AWS, Attitudes Towards Women Scale; HEI, Honor Endorsement Index.

^{^a}

1 = female, 2 = male.

^{^b}

0 = no threat, 1 = threat (high and low threat conditions combined).

^{^†}

p < .10.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.