Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 26;12:94. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00883-9

Table 2.

Correlations of PD-L2 methylation and mRNA expression with IFN-γ signature

IFNG STAT1 STAT2 STAT3 JAK2 IRF9
Analyte Spearman’s ρ P value Spearman’s ρ P value Spearman’s ρ P value Spearman’s ρ P value Spearman’s ρ P value Spearman’s ρ P value
PD-L2 mRNA 0.81 < 0.001 0.76 < 0.001 0.32 < 0.001 0.36 < 0.001 0.62 < 0.001 0.51 < 0.001
cg14440664 0.16 0.001 0.16 < 0.001 0.21 < 0.001 0.04 0.45 0.14 0.002 0.12 0.008
cg07211259 − 0.46 < 0.001 − 0.46 < 0.001 − 0.34 < 0.001 − 0.13 0.004 − 0.21 < 0.001 − 0.45 < 0.001
cg14351952 0.13 0.004 0.19 < 0.001 0.14 0.002 0.08 0.086 0.23 < 0.001 0.18 < 0.001
cg14133064 − 0.30 < 0.001 − 0.15 0.002 0.03 0.57 − 0.04 0.35 − 0.04 0.42 − 0.13 0.004
cg14374994 0.24 < 0.001 0.21 < 0.001 0.06 0.23 0.12 0.009 0.27 < 0.001 0.12 0.007

Correlations of PD-L2 methylation and mRNA expression with mRNA expression of IFNG and IFN-γ–regulated genes (STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, JAK2, and IRF9). DNA methylation was determined at five different CpG sites, each gene targeted by HumanMethylation450 BeadChip beads (Fig. 1). Significant features are shown in boldface. Data were procurable from N = 468 tumor samples