Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 1;7(2):211–217. doi: 10.1093/nop/npz048

Table 1.

Characteristics of Patients Treated With Stereotactic Radiation for Brain Metastases Secondary to Melanoma or Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Melanoma
Patients (N = 21)
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Patients (N = 21)
Median age at brain metastasis diagnosis, y 71.4 (25-92) 67.7 (48-82)
RPA status
 1 1 (5%) 0
 2 17 (81%) 16 (76%)
 3 3 (14%) 5 (24%)
Metastasis concurrent to melanoma diagnosis 3 11
Metachronous metastasis (No. of patients) 18 10
Median time postdiagnosis, y 4.8 (1-40) 2.1 (1-9.5)
Metastases (N = 23) Metastases (N = 30)
Delay between diagnosis and planning imaging, d 24 (7-70) 29 (8-107)
Delay between planning imaging and first radiation, d 19 (7-57) 19 (11-77)
Irradiation dose prescription (Gy on isodose 80%)
 -Monofractionated (1 × 20 Gy) 5 (22%) 3 (10%)
 -Trifractionated (3 × 9, 10 or 11 Gy) 15 (65%) 25 (84%)
 -Pentafractionated (5 × 5 Gy) 3 (13%) 2 (6%)
Healthy brain irradiated volume, PTV, cm3 9.65 (2.8-19.7) 7.7 (1.1-29.8)
Follow-up
Metastasis postradiation control 20/22 22/22
Radiologic necrosis occurrence (N metastasis) 8/22 (38%) 8/22 (36%)
New metastasis on follow-up (N patients) 5 (22%) 6 (29%)
Median time follow-up (months) 12 (1.6-23) 17 (9-23)

Abbreviations: PTV, planning target volume; RPA, recursive partitioning analysis.