Skip to main content
eClinicalMedicine logoLink to eClinicalMedicine
. 2020 Jun 26;24:100433. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100433

COVID-19 in 7780 pediatric patients: A systematic review

Ansel Hoang a, Kevin Chorath a,, Axel Moreira b, Mary Evans a, Finn Burmeister-Morton a, Fiona Burmeister a, Rija Naqvi a, Matthew Petershack a, Alvaro Moreira a,
PMCID: PMC7318942  PMID: 32766542

Abstract

Background

Studies summarizing the clinical picture of COVID-19 in children are lacking. This review characterizes clinical symptoms, laboratory, and imaging findings, as well as therapies provided to confirmed pediatric cases of COVID-19.

Methods

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched four medical databases (PubMed, LitCovid, Scopus, WHO COVID-19 database) between December 1, 2019 to May 14, 2020 using the keywords “novel coronavirus”, “COVID-19” or “SARS-CoV-2”. We included published or in press peer-reviewed cross-sectional, case series, and case reports providing clinical signs, imaging findings, and/or laboratory results of pediatric patients who were positive for COVID-19. Risk of bias was appraised through the quality assessment tool published by the National Institutes of Health. PROSPERO registration # CRD42020182261.

Findings

We identified 131 studies across 26 countries comprising 7780 pediatric patients. Although fever (59·1%) and cough (55·9%) were the most frequent symptoms 19·3% of children were asymptomatic. Patchy lesions (21·0%) and ground-glass opacities (32·9%) depicted lung radiograph and computed tomography findings, respectively. Immunocompromised children or those with respiratory/cardiac disease comprised the largest subset of COVID-19 children with underlying medical conditions (152 of 233 individuals). Coinfections were observed in 5.6% of children and abnormal laboratory markers included serum D-dimer, procalcitonin, creatine kinase, and interleukin-6. Seven deaths were reported (0·09%) and 11 children (0·14%) met inclusion for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.

Interpretation

This review provides evidence that children diagnosed with COVID-19 have an overall excellent prognosis. Future longitudinal studies are needed to confirm our findings and better understand which patients are at increased risk for developing severe inflammation and multiorgan failure.

Funding

Parker B. Francis and pilot grant from 2R25-HL126140. Funding agencies had no involvement in the study.

Introduction

In December 2019, an unprecedented number of pneumonia cases presented in adult individuals from Wuhan, China [1]. Despite rapid action by the Chinese government and health officials, the number of similar presenting cases continued to rise at an alarming rate [2]. By January 2020 an emerging zoonotic agent, known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was identified in respiratory samples in patients diagnosed with pneumonia who subsequently developed respiratory failure [1]. The spread of SARS-CoV-2 from human to human, through respiratory droplets, has now resulted in a worldwide outbreak, now classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization [3].

As of June 3rd, 2020, there has been more than 6·4 million confirmed cases worldwide and >380,000 fatalities [4] Most symptomatic cases have occurred in the adult population, characterized by fever, cough, malaise, and frequent hospitalization [1]. Accordingly, most of the published data is derived from adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were hospitalized in China [5]. As the pandemic continues, we are now observing numerous reports describing the clinical presentation and hospital course of children with confirmed COVID-19 [5].

What is currently known is that children have milder symptoms and are less likely to be hospitalized when compared to adults [6]. However, on May 14th, 2020 the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a health advisory reporting a multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19 [7]. This statement stemmed from a subset of pediatric patients manifesting with severe inflammation, multi-organ failure, and testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 [8,9].

Our goal was to conduct a systematic review: (i) to understand the clinical picture and presentation of pediatric patients with confirmed COVID-19, and (ii) to provide an initial observation of the signs, symptoms, and laboratory findings of pediatric patients who developed MIS-C.

Methods

2.1 Search strategy and selection criteria

Our methods adhere to the guidelines established by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Our study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under the following identifier # CRD42020182261.

We conducted a systematic search in the following databases: PubMed, LitCovid, Scopus, and the WHO COVID-19 database. Additionally, we searched for studies that included the following terms- “novel coronavirus, COVID-19, 2019-nCOV, SARS-CoV-2, pediatric, child, and neonate” into the freely accessible research domains of JAMA, Lancet, NEJM, CHEST, and Google Scholar. The last search was performed on May 14th, 2020 and was not limited by language (translation performed with Google Translate).

We included published or in press peer-reviewed articles reporting pediatric cases of confirmed COVID-19. We accepted the following types of studies: cross-sectional, cases series, case-control, case reports, review articles, opinion papers, and letters to journal editors that incorporated clinical, laboratory, imaging, and hospital course of pediatric patients. The pediatric population included neonates, children, and young adults up to 21 years of age. We set the upper limit of age to 21 years as several countries use this number to stratify their pediatric versus adult data. Patients were included if SARS-CoV-2 was detected by real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in nasopharyngeal, throat, blood, or stool samples at any point of their clinical evaluation. Suspected cases of COVID-19 without positive RT-PCR were excluded in this study. Furthermore, we also excluded in vitro studies or manuscripts focusing on animal experiments.

Screening by title and abstract was conducted independently by at least two investigators (AH, KC, or AxM). A third investigator (AM) was consulted to resolve differences of opinion in either phase. Subsequent full-text review and data extraction was conducted by all investigators using a standardized online form shared among the authors. Data retrieved from each article was cross-checked by at least two independent investigators.

Our outcomes of interest were to describe the clinical signs, imaging findings, and laboratory results characteristic of pediatric patients with confirmed COVID-19. Also, we wanted to provide an initial description of children with confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 who develop MIS-C. We used the definition by the CDC to define MIS-C

(e.g., fever, laboratory evidence of inflammation, and evidence of clinically severe illness requiring hospitalization, with multisystem (≥2) organ involvement with no alternative diagnosis, and positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection) [7]. Control cases were patients from the same case series who did not meet criteria for MIS-C or studies that presented individual patient data where MIS-C could be definitively ruled out.

2.2 Data collection and risk of bias assessment

Data extraction was performed by all investigators and compared by at least two investigators for consistency. Data collected included the type of article (e.g., case series), country of origin, number of pediatric patients, demographic information, and all clinical symptoms (e.g., fever, cough), laboratory values (e.g., CBC, LFTs, BMP), imaging studies (e.g., chest x-ray, CT, MRI), clinical outcomes (e.g., ICU admission), and treatments provided (e.g. antivirals).

The risk of bias for observational studies was appraised through the quality assessment tool published by the National Institutes of Health [10]. We opted to use this guide as the development of the assessment tool was conducted rigorously by researchers in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-Based Practice Centers, the Cochrane Collaboration, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Disseminations, and consulting epidemiologists. Moreover, it was a preferred tool in a systematic review on risk of bias assessments used in PROSPERO-registered protocols [11]. Risk of bias was assessed independently by at least two investigators and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher (AM). Furthermore, the level of evidence was assessed according to Sackett [12].

2.3 Data analysis

All laboratory data were converted to similar units and presented as mean with standard deviation (SD). Laboratory information presented as median (IQR) were converted to mean (SD), and denoted when unable to convert [13]. Publications that provided multiple timepoints (e.g., hospital course of individuals) for laboratory results were gathered and averaged. If the symptom was present anytime during the hospitalization, it was considered positive and characterized as a count with percent. A similar approach was taken for imaging information. Means, standard deviations, and proportion ratios were calculated using Microsoft Excel.

Statistical analyses between COVID-19 pediatric patients with/without MIS-C was conducted on STATA v·13. All statistical tests were two-sided, and significance was defined as a p value <0·05. Continuous data was summarized as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) and assessed by Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum. Categorical data was summarized as counts (percent) and analyzed by Fisher's exact test.

2.4 Role of the funding source

The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Results

The search yielded 1,142 studies. After removing 237 duplicates, 905 articles were reviewed by abstract and title. After initial screening, only 319 articles met inclusion criteria and underwent full text evaluation. Publications that were retracted, or consisted of editorials, reviews, or commentaries that did not meet our criteria were removed, generating a final list of 131 articles (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

PRISMA flow diagram.

Studies included in this review were published between January 24th to May 11th, 2020. Eight studies were cross sectional, 75 were case series, and 48 were case reports (refer to Table 1). Twenty-six countries were represented with the largest data derived from 2572 children from the United States. China comprised 64·1% of the studies included in this review. Appendix 1 displays publications by the country of origin.

Table 1.

Study characteristics.

# First author Study type Country N Age (years) Male N Clinical symptoms Laboratory findings Imaging characteristics Therapy ICU (N)
1
Aghdam, M Case report Iran 1 0.042 1 (100%) Fever, lethargy, mottling, respiratory distress Normal CBC, BUN, Cr, and ABG Normal CXR, no lung CT Fluids, oxygen, antibiotics, oseltamivir 1
2 Almeida, F Case report Brazil 1 10 0
(0%)
Fever, cough, sore throat, gross hematuria Urinalysis showed normal shaped red cells NR NR 0
3 Alonso Diaz, C Case report Spain 1 0.022 0
(0%)
Tachypnea, retractions, and desaturations 9 days after birth Normal CRP and capillary gas CXR: ground glass opacities in the right perihilar region Observation 1
4 An, P Case report China 1 3 0
(0%)
Asymptomatic NR CT: bilateral consolidation and ground-glass opacities Antibiotic 0
5 Andina, D Case series* Spain 1 NR 0
(0%)
Mild gastrointestinal symptoms and chilblains on feet NR NR Oral analgesic, antihistamine, topical corticosteroids for some patients NR
6 Andre, N Case series France 5 9.6 2
(40%)
Respiratory compromise in children with oncologic disease NR NR NR 5
7 Bi, Q Case series China 32 NR NR Time to recovery better in children <9 years of age (17.5 days) vs. 10-19 years (19.1 days), secondary household attack rate ~7.25% NR NR NR NR
8 Cai, J Case series China 10 6.17 4
(40%)
7 patients with fever, 6 with cough, 4 with sore throat, 0 with diarrhea, all patients were symptomatic ↑CRP (n=8), ↑PCT (n=6), ↑LDH (n=3); ↑WBC (n=3), ↑D-dimer (n=2) CXR: unilateral patchy infiltrates (n=4) Symptomatic treatment (n=5), symptomatic treatment + antibiotics (n=5) 0
9 Cai, JH Case report China 1 7 1
(100%)
Fever, cough, rhinorrhea, nausea ↑WBC, CRP, and D-dimer CXR: Bilateral thickening of lung texture Observation, Chinese medications 0
10 Calvo, C Cross sectional Spain 5 2.5 0
(0%)
NR NR NR NR NR
11 Canarutto, D Case report Italy 1 0.088 1
(100%)
Fever, cough, and rhinorrhea Mild neutropenia, monocytosis, and reactive lymphocytes on blood smear CXR:normal NR NR
12 Carrabba, G Case report Italy 1 0.67 1
(100%)
Mild temperature, dry cough NR CXR:no overt interstitial pneumonia but mild veiling opacity of left lung, no lung CT Neurosurgery for shunt revision x2 0
13 CDC COVID 19 Response team Case series USA 2572 9.8 1408 (57%) Symptom data available for 291 patients: 56% of pediatric patients reported fever, 54% reported cough, and 13% reported shortness of breath, 53 of 78 cases did not report symptoms, 23% (n=80) of 345 patients had at least 1 underlying medical condition, 3 deaths NR NR NR 15
14 Cela, E Case series Spain 15 10.1 14
(93%)
Fever (n=10), cough (n=6), asymptomatic (n=2), hypoxemia (n=2), all patients with oncologic disease median WBC 3.2, median lymphocyte 18.2%, median D-dimer normal CXR: normal (n=6), pneumonia (n=4), peribronchial cuffing (n=4) Hydroxychloroquine (n=11), tocilizumab & lopinavir/ritonavir (n=1), oxygen (n=2), antibiotic (n=2), remdesivir (n=1), no treatment (n=4) NR
15 Chacon-Aguilar, R Case report Spain 1 0.07 1
(100%)
Paroxysmal episodes with generalized hypertonia, fever, rhinorrhea, vomiting, diarrhea CBC, liver and kidney studies normal, ↑CK (380 U/L), ↑LDH (390 U/L), normal CRP NR Antibiotics 0
16 Chan, JF Case series* China 1 10 1
(100%)
Asymptomatic Normal CBC, fibrinogen, CRP, Cr, LDH, and CK, ↑alkaline phosphatase CT: bilateral ground-glass opacities NR 0
17 Chang, D Case series China 2 8.5 NR Fever, cough NR NR NR 0
18 Chen, F Case report China 1 1.08 1
(100%)
Fever, shortness of breath, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia/fatigue, cold limbs with poor perfusion Normal ABG, coagulation profile; LFTs, ↑BUN, Cr, CK, serum amyloid, IL-6, IL-10 CXR: large blurred image of the upper and lower right lung; CT: enhanced texture of both lungs, large consolidation on the right, ground-glass shadow Continuous dopamine, IV bolus, ventilator assistance, correction of acidosis, interferon, glucocorticoid, oseltamivir, antibiotics, abdominal decompression 1
19 Chen, H Case report China 1 12 1
(100%)
Fever, cough, abdominal pain, sputum production, no vomiting Normal CBC, ↑CRP CT: pneumonia in the right upper lung, followed by bilateral ground-glass opacities Antibiotics, arbidol, and supplemental oxygen NR
20 Chen, J Case series China 12 14.5 6
(50%)
Cough (75%), fever (58.3%), diarrhea (33%), dizziness (16.7%), sore throat (16.7%) Normal CBC, LFTs, BUN, PT, ↑total B and T cells when compared to adults, but comparable NK cell, IgM, IgG, and C3 Ground-glass opacity was the most common finding on chest CT All patients received interferon, 8 received lopinavir/ritonavir, and 2 received ribavirin 0
21 Cui, Y Case report China 1 0.15 0
(0%)
Pharyngeal hyperemia, rhinorrhea, cough, sputum Slightly elevated IgM, lymphocyte, and platelet counts; normal Hgb, D-dimer, PTT, PT, CRP, ESR, and renal function CT: Unilateral ground-glass opacity in the right lung and unilateral consolidation Interferon, antibiotic, ursodeoxycholic acid, Chinese medicine 1
22 de Rojas, T Case series Spain 15 10.1 14
(93%)
10 patients had fever, 6 patients had cough, 1 with hypoxemia, and 2 asymptomatic patients; all patients had an underlying oncologic disease Median WBC count was 3,195 and median lymphocyte count was 580 CXR: normal (n=6), pneumonia (n=4), peribronchial cuffing (n=4) 11 patients received hydroxychloroquine and 2 received antibiotics, tocilizumab (n=1), lopinavir-ritonavir (n=1), glucocorticoid (n=1), and remdesivir (n=1) 0
23 Denina, M Case series Italy 8 4.2 5
(63%)
Fever (n=6), dry cough (n=5), dyspnea (n=3), pharyngeal congestion (n=3), vomiting or diarrhea (n=3), hypoxemia (n=2) NR CXR: pulmonary consolidation (n=1), ground-glass opacities (n=4); LUS: confluent B-lines (n=5), subpleural consolidations (n=2) Oxygen (n=2) NR
24 Dona, D Case series Italy 2 0.29 NR Fever (n=1) diarrhea (n=1), respiratory symptoms in both NR NR NR 0
25 Dong, L Case report China 1 0.003 0
(0%)
Asymptomatic Nasopharyngeal test was negative, but IgM and IgG were elevated 2 hours after birth, ↑IL-6, IL-10, LDH CT: normal NR 1
26 Dong, Y Case series China 731 10 420
(58%)
315 mild illness, 300 moderate illness, 18 severe and 3 critically ill, 94 asymptomatic children NR NR NR NR
27 Du, W Case series China 14 7.1 6
(43%)
Fever (n=5) and cough (n=3) were commonly reported; Eight (57.1%) were asymptomatic ↑LDH (n=7), ↑PCT (n=5), ↑D-dimer (n=5), ↑CK (n=4), leukopenia (n=4), ↑IL-6 (n=1) CT: bilateral lung injury (n=6) and unilateral (n=5) NR 0
28 Fan, Q Case report China 1 0.25 0
(0%)
Fever and diarrhea Neutrophilia (86.2%), lymphopenia (7.1%) CT: normal Supportive care 0
29 Feng, K Case series China 15 7 4
(33%)
Asymptomatic (n=8), fever (n=5), cough or nasal congestion (n=1) ↓WBC (n=8), normal WBC (n=7) CT: ground glass lesions (n=7), no lesions (n=6), patchy shadow (n=2) NR NR
30 Ferrazzi, E Case series Italy 3 0.003 NR 1 neonate with gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms 3 days after birth NR NR NR 1
31 Genovese, G Case report Italy 1 8 0
(0%)
Fever, cough, papulovesicular rash to trunk Normal complete blood count, CRP, liver and kidney function, mild thrombocytopenia (105k) NR NR NR
32 Guan, W Case series China 9 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
33 Gubjartsson, D Cross sectional Iceland 1321 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
34 Han, M Case report Korea 1 0.07 0
(0%)
Fever, cough, and vomiting; viral shedding in urine and stool for 10 and 18 days, respectively First CBC with mild neutropenia (817 per mm3) CXR: normal No antibiotics or antivirals 0
35 Han, Y Case series China 7 4 4
(57%)
Fever (n=5), cough (n=5), shortness of breath (n=3), vomiting (n=4), diarrhea (n=4), sore throat (n=1), myalgia (n=1) ↑BNP (n=5), ↑CK (n=4), ↑PCT (n=3), ↑AST (n=3), ↑LDH (n=2), ↑CRP (n=2) Pneumonia on CT and CXR (n=5) Oxygen therapy (n=2) glucocorticoids (n=1) 0
36 Hrusak, O Cross sectional Czech Republic, USA, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Denmark, Austria, Sweden, Belgium, Netherlands 9 NR NR Fever (n=7) and diarrhea (n=1) were the most common symptoms in this cohort of children with oncologic disease Lymphopenia (n = 1), neutropenia (n=5) Normal CXR in 1 patient, all others NR Antibiotics (n=2) lopinavir/ritonavir (n=1) hydroxychloroquine (n=2) 0
37 Hu, X Case series* China 1 0.004 1
(100%)
Asymptomatic WBC, Hgb, Plts, CRP, Cr, ALT normal, ↑PCT (n=6) Normal CXR=1; no CT data NR 0
38 Ibrahim, L Case series Australia 4 13.1 1
(25%)
Sore throat (n=4), headache/dizziness (n=3), cough (n=2), fever (n=1) NR NR None 0
39 Ji, L Case series China 2 12 2
(100%)
Fever and diarrhea (n=1) ↑WBC (n=1), ↑CRP (n=1) CT: normal (n=2) Symptomatic treatment, oral probiotic 0
40 Ji, T Case series China 19 NR NR Asymptomatic (n=9) NR NR NR NR
41 Jiang, S Case series China 2 5.08 0
(0%)
Fever, cough, and vomiting in both patients ↑WBC, neutrophil count, CRP, PCT, serum amyloid A (n=1) CT: normal (n=1), bilateral ground-glass opacities with patchy shadows (n=1) Antibiotics (n=2), oseltamivir (n=1), glucocorticoids (n=1), IVIG (n=1) 1
42 Jones, V Case report USA 1 0.5 0
(0%)
Fussy, conjunctivitis, dry cracked lips, prominent tongue papilla, polymorphous maculopapular rash, swelling of hands and feet, fever, anorexia WBC with bandemia, ↑CRP, normal ESR, BMP, and LFTs CXR: faint opacity in left midlung IVIG and acetylsalicylic acid NR
43 Kam, K Case report Singapore 1 0.5 1
(100%)
Asymptomatic initially, followed by fever Viremia, normal CBC, LFTs NR NR NR
44 Kan, M Case report USA 1 0.02 0
(0%)
Fever, tachycardia, cough; underlying condition of hydronephrosis and duplicating renal system Leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, normocytic anemia, normal platelets, normal CRP NR Bolus, antibiotic, antipyretics 0
45 Korean Society of Infectious Diseases Cross sectional Korea 201 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
46 Lai, W Case series China 2 14 2
(100%)
2 with dry cough, 2 with fever, and 1 with malaise NR CT: unilateral patchy ground-glass opacities (n=2) Antivirals, supportive 0
47 Le, H Case report Vietnam 1 0.25 0
(0%)
Rhinorrhea and nasal congestion, fussy Normal CBC, CK, LDH, CRP, and PCT CXR:normal Antibiotic NR
48 Leva, E Case series Italy 16 NR NR All patients with fever and cough NR NR NR 4
49 Li, H Case series China 40 5.1 23
(58%)
Cough (n=27), fever (n=21), myalgia (n=4), diarrhea (n=4), rhinorrhea (n=2), sore throat (n=2) Normal CBC, CRP, PCT, ↑CD3+, CD8+ lymphocyte (n=40), ↑% of CD3+ (n=40), and ↓ percentage of CD19+ lymphocyte (n=40) CT: unilateral (n=13), bilateral (n=26) ground-glass opacities, normal (n=1) Interferon (n=40), oseltamivir (n=20), IVIG (n=4), steroids (n=3), azithromycin (n=13), mechanical ventilation (n=1) 1
50 Li, J Case report China 1 0.67 0
(0%)
Cough WBC and differential, PT, D-dimer, LFTs and renal function normal, ↑CRP Normal CT Interferon 0
51 Li, M Case report China 1 0.006 1
(100%)
Patient had no fever or cough NR NR NR 0
52 Li, W Case series China 4 7.2 4
(100%)
Cough NR NR NR NR
53 Li, Wei Case series China 5 3.4 4
(80%)
Asymptomatic (n=4), 1 patient with rhinorrhea, cough, sore throat, and fever ↑WBC (n=2), ↑CRP (n=1) CT: patchy ground-glass opacities (n=3), normal (n=2) IVIG (n=5), antivirals (n=2), montelukast (n=3), interferon (n=2) NR
54 Li, Y Case series China 2 4 1
(50%)
Cough and rhinorrhea (n=1) ↓neutrophils (n=1), ↑CRP (n=1), normal coagulation profile, LFTs and renal function in both patients CT: bilateral spots upper lobes (n=1), increased bronchovascular bundles bilaterally (n=1) Oxygen (n=1) 0
55 Lin, J Case report China 1 7 0
(0%)
Nasal congestion and dry cough; no fever, dyspnea, or diarrhea NR CT showed no signs of pneumonia Supportive treatment, oseltamivir, and interferon NR
56 Liu, M Case series China 5 6.4 4
(80%)
3 were asymptomatic, 2 patients with fever and dry cough Normal WBC, mild neutropenia (n=3) CT: unilateral (n=3) and bilateral (n=1) ground-glass opacities Interferon (n=4), ribavirin (n=3) NR
57 Liu, W Case series China 6 3.5 2
(33%)
High fever and cough in all patients; vomiting (n=4) White cells (n=4), lymphocytes (n=6), and neutrophils (n=3) were decreased CT: patchy shadows bilaterally (n=3), patchy ground-glass opacities in both lungs (n=1), normal (n=1) Oseltamivir (n=6), glucocorticoid (n=4), ribavirin (n=2), IVIG (n=1) 1
58 Liu, Y Case report China 1 10 1
(100%)
Asymptomatic Normal CBC, LFTs, ↑LDH, borderline ↑CRP CT: ground-glass opacity and pleural effusion Ribavirin, interferon 0
59 Locatelli, A Case report Italy 1 16 1
(100%)
Mild diarrhea and chilblain-like lesions to fingers and a toe Coagulation, autoimmunity, cryoglobulins normal NR NR NR
60 Lou, X Case series China 3 4.8 1
(33%)
All patients had fever; 2 with fatigue, nasal congestion, diarrhea, and headache NR NR Interferon (n=2) 0
61 Lu, X Case series China 171 6.4 104
(61%)
Fever (41.5%), pharyngeal erythema (46.2%), diarrhea (8.8%), asymptomatic (15.8%), 1 death ↓WBC (26.3%), lymphopenia (3.5%), ↑PCT (64%), ↑CRP (19.7%), ↑D-dimer (14.1%), ↑AST (14.6%) CT: ground glass opacity (32.7%), unilateral or bilateral patchy shadowing (31%), interstitial abnormalities (1.2%) NR 3
62 Lu, Y Case series China 9 7.8 5
(56%)
Fever (n=6), cough (n=3), asymptomatic (n=1) All WBC counts were normal CXR: no overt abnormality (n=5); CT: no overt abnormality (n=4), patch ground-glass opacities (n=4) NR 0
63 Lu, Yingying Case series China 110 5.8 59
(53%)
Cough and dyspnea (51.8%), followed by fever (50.9%) were the most common symptoms, 26 (23.6%) patients had gastrointestinal symptoms, 29 (26.4%) were asymptomatic Symptomatic patients were more likely to have a ↓Hgb (16.4% vs. 0%), ↑AST (23.5% vs. 0%), and trended towards an ↑IL-6 (12% vs. 0%) 64 patients had a chest x-ray demonstrating pneumonia All received antivirals, interferon was the most frequently used, Chinese medication (n=22) 0
64 Ma, H Case series China 50 3.3 28
(56%)
32 with fever, 22 with cough, 8 with rhinorrhea, 1 with sore throat, 2 with myalgia, 3 with diarrhea, 6 with no symptoms Leukocytosis (n=2), leukopenia (n=19), polycythemia (n=2), thrombocytopenia (n=7), ↑CRP (n=10) CT: ground-glass opacities (n=29), local patchy shadowing (n=9), normal (n=7) NR NR
65 Ma, H2 Case series China 22 5.5 12
(55%)
Fever (n=13), dry cough (n=5), shortness of breath (n=1), asymptomatic (n=2) NR CT: ground-glass shadows (n=6), consolidation (n=4), consolidation and ground-glass shadows (n=6), bronchial pneumonia-like changes (n=3), normal (n=3) NR NR
66 Ma, Y Case series China 115 NR 73
(64%)
Asymptomatic (n=61), fever (n=29), cough (n=47), rhinorrhea (n=47), gastrointestinal symptoms (n=3) Normal WBC (n=88), ↓WBC (n=23); lymphocytes normal (n=60), ↑lymphocytes (n=40); normal neutrophils (n=77),↑neutrophils (n=32), ↑ALT (n=11), ↑CK-MB (n=34), ↑BUN/Cr (n=2) CT: ground-glass opacities (n=49), normal (n=27) NR NR
67 Mansour, A Case report Lebanon 1 1.33 0
(0%)
Patient presented with fever, diarrhea, and decreased activity Leukocytosis, elevated platelets, elevated CRP, decreased hemoglobin/hematocrit CXR: unilateral, large consolidation with bronchial infiltrate Hydration and antibiotics 0
68 Mao, L Case report China 1 1.16 1
(100%)
Patient presented with fever, cough, congestion, rhinorrhea, decreased appetite Normal CBC, PCT, LFTs, renal function, D-dimer; normal T cell, B cell, and NK cell, ↑CRP CT: unilateral ground-glass opacities in right lower lung Interferon and supportive 0
69 Mizumoto, K Case series Japan 3 NR NR Asymptomatic (n=2) NR NR NR NR
70 Morey-Olive, M Case series Spain 2 3 1
(50%)
Low grade fever (n=2) Abnormal liver enzymes and coagulation parameters in 1 patient NR NR 0
71 Munoz, A Case report USA 1 0.06 1
(100%)
Nasal congestion, tachypnea, reduced feeding, subsequent pneumothorax ↑PCT (6.53 ng/mL) and ↑CRP (172 mg/L) CXR: bilateral linear opacities and consolidation of right upper lobe Mechanical ventilation, antibiotics, hydroxychloroquine, vasopressors 1
72 Nathan, N Case series France 5 0.18 5
(100%)
All had fever, 4 patients with hypotonia or drowsiness and moaning, 4 with cough and rhinorrhea CBC normal, ↑CRP (n=3), ↑PCT (n=1) Normal CXR in 4 patients, 1 patient with hyperinflation Antipyretics 0
73 Ng, K Case series UK 8 0.39 2
(25%)
Fever (n=5), anorexia (n=4), tachypnea (n=2), skin mottling (n=1) 2 patients had neutropenia and thrombocytosis 2 patients had some opacities on CXR 4 patients treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics 2
74 Odievre, M Case report France 1 16 0
(0%)
Fever, followed by acute chest syndrome in a patient with sickle cell disease ↑CRP, ↑D-dimer, ↑IL-6, ↑LDH, ↑TNF-α CT: bilateral pulmonary embolisms and bilateral consolidation with halo sign on right Acetaminophen, non-invasive ventilation, blood transfusion, anticoagulation, tocilizumab 1
75 Pan, A Case series China 536 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
76 Park, J Case report Korea 1 10 0
(0%)
Low-grade fever and sputum production CBC, CRP normal, stool sample remained positive for 17 days after symptom onset CT: unilateral patchy or nodular consolidations with peripheral ground-glass opacities None 0
77 Parri, N Case series Italy 100 6 57
(57%)
Fever (n=54), cough (n=44), rhinorrhea (n=22), asymptomatic (n=21), shortness of breath (n=11), nausea (n=10), vomiting (n=10), diarrhea (n=9), myalgia (n=9), sore throat (n=4), headache (n=4); 27 patients with underlying medical conditions WBC normal (n=40), ↓WBC (n=11), lymphocytopenia (n=14), ↑PCT (n=4), ↑LDH (n=22), ↑ALT (n=8), ↑AST (n=10) CXR: interstitial abnormality (n=14), normal (n=15), consolidation (n=6), pleural effusion (n=1); LUS: interstitial syndrome (n=9), small sub-pleural consolidations (n=4) Non-invasive ventilation; mechanical ventilation (n=1) 9
78 Patek, P Case report USA 1 0.04 1
(100%)
Fever, hypoxemia Normal CBC, mild elevation to AST and ALT, CSF unremarkable CXR: bilateral perihilar streaking without focal consolidation Oxygen, empiric antibiotics, acyclovir 1
79 Patel, P Case report USA 1 12 0
(0%)
Fever, cough, vomiting, hematuria, and respiratory failure Severe thrombocytopenia (<10k per μL), elevated inflammatory markers (CRP, PCT, ferritin) CXR: bilateral diffuse airspace opacities and small pleural effusion
IVIG, corticosteroids, mechanical ventilation, nitric oxide, azithromycin,hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab 1
80 Piersigilli, F Case report Belgium 1 0.002 0
(0%)
No COVID-related symptoms; child is an extremely premature neonate ↓WBC and lymphopenia Normal radiographic findings Continuous positive airway pressure 1
81 Qian, G Case series* China 1 1.08 0
(0%)
Asymptomatic NR CT: normal NR 0
82 Qiu, H Case series China 36 8.3 23
(64%)
Fever (n=13), cough (n=7), headache (n=3), vomiting/diarrhea (n=2) Leukopenia (n=7), ↓lymphocytes (n=11), ↑PCT (n=6), ↑CK-MB (n=11) CXR: ground-glass opacities (n=19) Interferon (n=36), lopinavir/ritonavir (n=14), oxygen (n=6) NR
83 Qiu, L Case report China 1 0.66 1
(100%)
Fever, cough, wheezing, apnea, mottled skin, petechiae, cold fingers; patient with cardiac history Initial labs demonstrated lymphopenia, ↓CD3+, ↓CD4+, ↓CD8+, ↓fibrinogen, ↑LDH, normal PCT and renal function CXR: increased density, profusion, thickened lung texture; CT: multiple ground-glass opacities and patchy, high density shadows IVIG, lopinavir/ritonavir, methylprednisolone, fluids, electrolytes, pressors 1
84 Robbins, E Case report USA 1 0.16 1
(100%)
Fever CBC within normal limits, CMP normal except for a mildly elevated alkaline phosphatase and calcium CXR: normal Antibiotics, supportive NR
85 Schwierzeck, V Case series Germany 3 10 NR Asymptomatic (n=2), fever (n=1), cough (n=1), nasal congestion (n=1) in patients with renal disease NR NR NR NR
86 See, K Case series Malaysia 4 6.4 3
(75%)
Mild fever and diarrhea (n=1); rhinorrhea (n=1), cough and fever (n=1 mild), asymptomatic (n=1) NR CXR: perihilar opacities (n=2) Antipyretics (n=2), antibiotic (n=1), rehydration (n=1), salbutamol (n=1) 0
87 Shekerdemian, L Cross sectional USA, Canada 48 11.3 25
(52%)
11 patients (23%) with multi-organ failure, 73% (n=35) with pulmonary symptoms, 40% (n=19) of children were medically complex NR NR No medications (n=20), hydroxychloroquine (n=21), 17% underwent antiviral therapy, tocilizumab (n=5), mechanical ventilation (n=18), azithromycin (n=8)
88 Shen, Q Case series China 9 7.5 3
(33%)
2 asymptomatic, 3 with fever, 1 with diarrhea, sore throat, or cough, and 1 with fever and diarrhea ↑WBC (n=1), ↑lymphocyte count (n=1), ↑CRP (n=1), ↑ESR (n=4), ↑LDH (n=4) Normal chest x-ray and lung CT in 7 patients, 2 (22.2%) with small ground-glass opacities All received oxygen and lopinavir/ritonavir, antibiotic treatment for 5 children, glucocorticoids and IVIG for 1 patient 0
89 Shi, B Case report China 1 0.23 1
(100%)
Cough, wheeze, dyspnea WBC normal, ↑lymphocyte and platelet count; IgG, IgM, IgA, T, B, and NK cells normal, LFTs normal, RSV+ CT: left lower lobe consolidation Antibiotics, CPAP, IVIG, corticosteroids, interferon, Chinese medication 1
90 Shi, Y Cross sectional China 10 6 5
(50%)
NR NR NR NR 0
91 Sieni, E Case report Italy 1 1.08 0
(0%)
Fever, vomiting, and diarrhea; patient with underlying oncologic disease Leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia CXR: bilateral reticular findings Antifungal, antibiotics, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir 0
92 Sinelli, MT Case report Italy 1 0.006 1
(100%)
Hypoxemia, perioral cyanosis, poor sucking Normal complete blood count and C-reactive protein CT: mild bilateral ground-glass opacities Oxygen support 1
93 Song, R Case series China 7 3.5 1
(14%)
Most asymptomatic, only 2 had fever Normal WBC, ↓neutrophils, ↑LDH, normal fibrinogen NR All patients received supportive care, interferon, lopinavir/ritonavir NR
94 Song, W Case series China 16 7.9 10
(63%)
Asymptomatic (n=8), cough (n=6), fever (n=5) Leukocytes normal (n=14), CRP normal (n=15), liver, renal, coagulation, electrolytes, and myocardial labs were normal, ↑LDH (n=3) CT: normal (n=5), bilateral ground-glass opacities (n=8), bilateral consolidation (n=1), patchy/nodular shadow (n=3) Oseltamivir (n=11), antibiotics (n=9), lopinavir/ritonavir (n=4), Chinese medicine (n=13), arbidol (n=6) 0
95 Su, L Case series China 9 3.5 3
(33%)
Asymptomatic (n=6), fever or cough (n=3) ↑CK-MB (n=6), ↓WBC (n=2), LFTs normal, inflammatory markers (CRP, PCT, ESR, IL-6) were normal in all patients, stools positive in 5 children warranting readmission CT/x-ray: normal (n=5), bronchitis (n=2), pulmonary consolidation and ground-glass opacities (n=1), bronchopneumonia (n=1) Interferon given to all patients; ribavirin (n=1) 0
96 Sun, D Case series China 8 6.6 6
(75%)
Tachypnea (n=8), fever or cough (n=6 each), sputum production (n=4), nausea/vomiting (n=4), diarrhea (n=3), fatigue or headache (n=1 each) Normal/↑ WBC (n=7), ↑CRP, ↑PCT, ↑LDH (n=6), abnormal LFTs (n=4) CT/x-ray: multiple patch-like shadows (n=6), ground-glass opacities (n=6), unilateral pneumonia (n=2), bilateral pneumonia (n=6) Oxygen (n=6), mechanical ventilation (n=2), all patients received antivirals (virazole, oseltamivir, interferon), antibiotics (n=5), glucocorticoids (n=5), IVIG (n=4), Chinese medications (n=4) 3
97 Sun, K Case series China 13 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
98 Sun, M Case series* China 1 0.02 1
(100%)
NR NR NR NR 0
99 Tagarro, A Cross sectional Spain 41 3.3 18
(44%)
Upper respiratory symptoms in 14 (34%), fever (n=11), gastroenteritis or vomiting (n=2) NR NR 25 (60%) required hospitalization, 2 received noninvasive ventilation and 1 was intubated 4
100 Tan, X Case series China 13 7.9 4
(31%)
Respiratory symptoms (n=7), cough (n=6), low fever (n=6), sore throat (n=2), asymptomatic (n=2) LFTs, myocardial enzymes, PCT, coagulation, ferritin were normal, ↑ESR (n=3), CRP level increased (13.2 mg/L) CT: normal (n=7); abnormal: cord-like shadows (n=2), showed ground glass shadows (n=2), had patchy high-density shadow (n=2)
Lopinavir/ritonavir (n=12), interferon (n=10), arbidol (n=6) 0
101 Tan, Y Case series China 10 7 3
(30%)
4 patients with fever, 3 with respiratory symptoms, and 1 with vomiting Normal CBC (n=9), ↑WBC and lymphocytes (n=1), ↑AST (n=2), CRP, LDH, and ferritin normal in all patients, mycoplasma+ (n=3) CT: ground-glass opacities (n=5) All patients treated with symptomatic support 0
102 Tang, A Case report China 1 10 1
(100%)
Asymptomatic CBC:normal CT: normal Arbidol, interferon, Chinese medication 0
103 Tong, Z Case series* China 1 12 1
(100%)
NR NR NR NR NR
104 Turner, D Case series Israel, China, Spain, Italy, Korea, USA, UK, Portugal, France 8 16 5
(63%)
Fever (n=3), cough (n=3), myalgia/fatigue (n=4) in children with inflammatory bowel disease NR NR 5ASA (n=4), infliximab (n=2), thiopurines (n=4), glucocorticoids (n=1) 0
105 Wang, D Case series China 31 7.1 15
(48%)
Asymptomatic (n=4), fever (n=20), cough (n=14), fatigue and diarrhea (n=3 each), sore throat (n=2), headache/dizziness (n=3), rhinorrhea (n=2), vomiting (n=2) ↓Leukocytes and lymphocytes (n=2), ↑CRP (10%), ↑PCT (4%), ↑ESR (19%), ↑transaminases (22%), renal function normal CT lung changes in 14 children, 9 of which showed patchy ground-glass opacities Interferon (n=10), Antibiotics (n=6),
oseltamivir (n=1), 18 were a combination of interferon, oseltamivir, ribavirin, arbidol, and/or lopinavir/ritonavir
0
106 Wang, H Case report China 1 8 1
(100%)
Fever NR CT: left lower lobe ground-glass opacity Antiviral and symptomatic treatment NR
107 Wang, J Case report China 1 0.05 1
(100%)
Fever, cough, vomiting, diarrhea On admission: ↓WBC, ↑monocytes, ↓Plts CT: bilateral pneumonia and bilateral ground-glass opacities Interferon NR
108 Wang, S Case report China 1 0.003 1
(100%)
Asymptomatic Lymphopenia, ↑AST, ↑CK, ↑direct and total bilirubin CT: unilateral ground-glass opacities Antibiotic, vitamin K, bolus 1
109 Wang, Y Case series China 43 6.92 21
(49%)
The most common symptoms were dyspnea (87.5%), fever (62.5%), and cough (62.5%) IL-6, IL-10, D-dimer, total bilirubin, and uric acid were elevated in severe cases All severe cases had lesions on chest CT; ground-glass opacities (n=24), patchy consolidation (n=9) All severe cases received supplemental oxygen; 5 placed on non-invasive respiratory mode and 3 were intubated NR
110 Wei, M Case series China 9 1.1 2
(22%)
Asymptomatic (n=6), fever (n=4), cough (n=2), rhinorrhea (n=1), sputum production (n=1) NR NR NR 0
111 Wu, P Case report China 1 2.83 1
(100%)
Conjunctivitis and eyelid dermatitis Normal CBC, CRP, CK, liver measurements, ↑CK-MB, ↑LDH, ↓creatinine Normal lung CT and x-ray NR NR
112 Wu, Q Case series China 74 6.8 44
(60%)
Asymptomatic (40.5%), cough (32.4%) and fever (27.0%) Leukopenia (n=4), lymphopenia (n=4), ↑CRP (n=13), ↑PCT (n=2), ↑ESR (n=5); co-infection (n=26) CT: ground glass opacities (n=9), atypical changes of bronchopneumonia and common viral pneumonia (n=28); normal (n=37) All patients received interferon, Chinese medications, and antivirals; 27 patients received antibiotics 1
113 Wu, Z Cross sectional China 965 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
114 Xia, W Case series China 20 NR 13
(63%)
Cough (n=13), fever (n=12), diarrhea (n=3), dyspnea (n=2), sore throat (n=1), fatigue (n=1) 13 patients with elevated lymphocytes; 2 patients with elevated WBC CT: consolidation (n=10), ground-glass opacities (n=12), shadow (n=4), nodules (n=3) NR NR
115 Xing, Y Case series China 3 NR NR Fever in all patients, gastrointestinal symptoms (n=1) SARS-CoV-2 detectable in stool for 1-3 weeks after negative conversion in throat swabs NR NR 0
116 Xing, YH Case series China 3 4.2 2
(67%)
Fever (n=3), 1 patient had cough and diarrhea Viral RNA remained detectable in stool for longer than 4 weeks, leukocytosis (n=3), ↑Plts (n=2), ↑PCT (n=1), ↑CRP (n=1), ↑LDH (n=1), ↑D-dimer (n=1) CT: unilateral ground glass opacities (n=1), unilateral consolidation (n=1), normal (n=1); CXR: patchy shadows (n=1) Interferon, ribavirin, and Chinese medications were given to all patients 0
117 Xu, Y Case series China 10 7.54 6
(60%)
Fever (n=7), cough (n=5), sore throat (n=4), diarrhea (n=3), rhinorrhea (n=2), asymptomatic (n=1) WBC counts normal, neutropenia (n=4), lymphocytopenia (n=3), lymphocytosis (n=1), ↑PCT (n=5), ↑ESR (n=3),↑CRP (n=3), ↑LDH (n=2), ↑D-dimer (n=1), ↑ferritin (n=1), normal CK NR Interferon (n=10), antibiotics (n=1), IVIG (n=1) NR
118 Yin, X Case report China 1 9 1
(100%)
Fever; no cough, sore throat, or nausea Lymphopenia, ↑α hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, ↑CRP, ↑amyloid, normal PCT and CK CXR: normal Antipyretic NR
119 Yu, N Case report China 1 0.004 NR Dyspnea; no fever, cough, or diarrhea NR CXR: mild pneumonia Observation 1
120 Zeng, L Case report China 1 0.05 1
(100%)
Sneezing, vomiting, lethargy, poor feeding ↑lymphocytes, ↓neutrophils and procalcitonin CT: bilateral enhanced texture and blurred shadows NR 1
121 Zeng, Lingkong Case series China 3 0.003 3
(100%)
Fever (n=2), lethargy (n=2), shortness of breath and cyanosis (n=1), vomiting (n=1) Leukocytosis (n=2), ↑PCT (n=1), ↑CK-MB (n=1), thrombocytopenia (n=1) CT: pneumonia (n=3) Mechanical ventilation (n=1), antibiotics (n=1) 3
122 Zhang, B Case series China 46 8.75 29
(63%)
Asymptomatic (n=22), cough (n=15), fever (n=10), rhinorrhea/nasal congestion (n=6), sore throat (n=4), myalgia/fatigue (n=3) No leukopenia or lymphopenia CXR: ground glass opacity (n=13), mixed ground glass opacity and consolidation (n=4), local patchy shadowing (n=1), consolidation (n=1) Most treated with 1-3 antiviral drugs 0
123 Zhang, B2 Case series China 3 9.3 2
(67%)
Asymptomatic (n=2), crying (n=1), fever, cough, and malaise (n=1) PCT normal (n=3), lymphocytosis (n=1), ↑CRP (n=2), ↑CK (n=1), ↑LDH (n=1) CT: normal (n=2); CXR: bilateral pneumonia (n=1) Two hospitalizations for all patients due to persistent SARS-CoV-2 positivity; oseltamivir (n=2), arbidol and lopinavir/ritonavir (n=2), oxygen (n=2), all received Chinese medication 0
124 Zhang, M Case series* China 1 15 1
(100%)
Low-grade fever and myalgia NR NR NR NR
125 Zhang, T Case series China 3 7.7 3
(100%)
Fever (n=2), rhinorrhea (n=2), cough (n=1) Normal electrolytes, liver, and kidney function, normal PCT, LDH, and IL-6; 1 patient with elevated CRP (64.7 mg/L); immunologic profile normal, stool nucleic acid was still positive 10 days after clinical recovery CT: ground glass opacities (n=2) Interferon, Chinese medications, and vitamin C for all patients, 1 patient received antibiotics 0
126 Zhang, Y Case report China 1 0.25 0
(0%)
Fever and sputum production Decreased neutrophil count; elevated CRP and platelet count, normal PCT NR Ambroxol and aerosolization 0
127 Zhang, Z Case series China 4 0.02 3
(75%)
Fever (n=2), shortness of breath (n=1), cough (n=1), vomiting (n=1), and 1 asymptomatic NR CT: increased lung markings (n=3) Supportive 0
128 Zhao, W Case series China 2 6.5 NR NR NR NR NR NR
129 Zheng, F Case series China 25 5.1 14
(56%)
Fever (n=13), cough (n=11), diarrhea (n=3), dyspnea (n=2), vomiting (n=2), abdominal pain (n=2), nasal congestion (n=2) Median WBC, lymphocytes, CRP, CK within normal limits; lymphopenia (n=10), normal renal and coagulation profile (n=23) CT: bilateral patchy shadows/consolidations (n=11), unilateral patchy shadows/consolidations (n=5), normal (n=8) Antiviral therapy (n=12, included interferon, arbidol, oseltamivir, and/or lopinavir/ritonavir), 13 received antibiotics; 2 patients were intubated, and given corticosteroids and IVIG 2
130 Zhou, Y Case series China 9 1.58 4
(44%)
Asymptomatic (n=5), fever (n=4), cough (n=2), rhinorrhea (n=1) normal WBC (n=7), lymphocytosis (n=6), ↑LDH (n=2 of 4 samples), ↑CRP (n=2 of 7 samples) CT: ground-glass opacities (n=7), nodular morphology (n=6) Interferon (n=9), lopinavir (n=6) 0
131 Zhu, L Case series China 10 9 5
(50%)
Fever (n=4), cough (n=3), headache (n=2), asymptomatic (n=4) WBC, CRP and PCT normal in all children; ↑ALT (n=2) CT: pneumonia (n=5) Lopinavir/ritonavir (n=4), interferon (n=4), oseltamivir (n=1), antibiotics (n=1), oxygen (n=1), glucocorticoids and IVIG (n=0) 0

Abbreviations: ABG-arterial blood gas; ASA-aminosalicylate; ALT- alanine aminotransferase; AST-aspartate aminotransferase; BUN-blood urea nitrogen; BNP-brain natriuretic peptide; CBC-complete blood count; CK-creatine kinase; CPAP-continuous positive airway pressure; Cr-creatinine; CRP-C-reactive protein; CT-computed tomography; CXR-chest radiograph; ESR-erythrocyte sedimentation rate; Hgb-hemoglobin; Ig-immunoglobulin; IL-interleukin; IVIG-intravenous immunoglobulin; LDH-lactate dehydrogenase; LFTs-liver function tests; LUS-lung ultrasound; NK-natural killer cell; NR-not reported; PCT-procalcitonin; Plts-platelets; PT-prothrombin time; PTT-partial thromboplastin time; RSV-respiratory syncytial virus; TNF-tumor necrosis factor. *One patient met our inclusion, but the publication was a case series.

Twenty of the publications pertained to the neonatal population and the ages extended from an extremely premature neonate at 26 weeks gestation to 20 years of age. The level of evidence for all of the studies was 5 (1 is highest, 5 is lowest) and the risk of bias scores were between 2 to 7 (1 is lowest, 9 is highest, refer to Appendix 2).

A total of 7780 COVID-19 positive children were included. Fifty six percent of the individuals were male (Table 2).

Table 2.

Patient characteristics, exposure status, and hospital stay.

# Studies # Patients N (%)
Male gender 113 4640 2582 (55.6)
Mean age (years) 116 4517 8.9 ± 0.5
Exposure from family member 94 1360 1028 (75.6)
Travel to/lived-in high-risk area 84 962 689 (71.6)
NP/throat SARS-CoV-2 detection 89 787 681 (86.5)
Positive fecal viral shedding 31 321 67 (20.9)
Positive urine viral shedding 22 54 2 (3.7)
Length of hospital stay (days) 68 652 11.6 ± 0.3
Intensive care unit admission 88 3564 116 (3.3)

Continuous data presented as Mean ± SD. NP-nasopharyngeal.

The mean age was 8·9 years (SD 0·5) and 75·6% of patients were exposed to a family member who was diagnosed with COVID-19. The most common method for detection of the virus was through nasopharyngeal or throat swab (86·5%). Need for intensive care unit observation or treatment was low (3·3%). Twenty studies (n=655 individuals) reported an underlying medical condition; COVID-19 positive children who were immunosuppressed or had a history of a respiratory or cardiac condition comprised the majority (65·%). Moreover, influenza and Mycoplasma were the most common co-infections (see Table 3).

Table 3.

Underlying medical conditions and co-infection.

# Studies # Patients N (%)
Underlying conditions 20 655 233 (35.6)
Immunosuppression 71 (30.5)
Respiratory 49 (21.0)
Cardiovascular 32 (13.7)
Medically complex/congenital malformations 25 (10.7)
Not reported 17 (7.3)
Hematologic 8 (3.8)
Neurologic 8 (3.4)
Obesity 8 (3.4)
Prematurity 5 (3.4)
Endocrine/metabolic 5 (2.1)
Renal 4 (1.7)
Gastrointestinal 1 (0.5)
Co-infections 35 1183 72 (5.6)
Bacterial
Mycoplasma pneumoniae 42 (58.3)
Enterobacter sepsis 2 (2.8)
Streptococcus pneumoniae 1 (1.4)
Viral
Influenza virus A/B 8 (11.1)
Respiratory syncytial virus 7 (9.7)
Cytomegalovirus 3 (4.2)
Epstein-Barr virus 3 (4.2)
Adenovirus 2 (2.8)
Human metapneumovirus 2 (2.8)
Human parainfluenza virus 2 (2.8)

Table 4 summarizes clinical symptoms and imaging findings in COVID-19 confirmed pediatric patients. No symptoms were described in 456 of 2367 patients (19·3%), while the two most common symptoms were fever (59·1%), and cough (55·9%). While upper respiratory symptoms were characteristic of COVID-19, some patients presented with mild or often overlooked symptoms such as fatigue, abdominal pain, or decreased appetite [[14], [15]16]. Table 4 also summates imaging findings. According to chest x-ray and computed tomography (CT), 23·6% and 18·9% had normal results, respectively. Patchy lesions were observed in 105 of 501 patients on chest radiography and bilateral ground glass opacities were the most frequent CT abnormality.

Table 4.

Clinical symptoms and imaging

# Studies # Patients N (%)
Clinical symptoms
Asymptomatic 119 2367 456 (19.3)
Fever 119 2445 1446 (59.1)
Cough 119 2445 1367 (55.9)
Rhinorrhea, nasal congestion 119 2445 488 (20.0)
Myalgia, fatigue 119 2445 457 (18.7)
Sore throat 119 2445 446 (18.2)
Shortness of breath, dyspnea 119 2445 287 (11.7)
Abdominal pain, diarrhea 119 2445 159 (6.5)
Vomiting, nausea 119 2445 131 (5.4)
Headache, dizziness 119 2445 104 (4.3)
Pharyngeal erythema 119 2445 80 (3.3)
Decreased oral intake 119 2445 42 (1.7)
Rash 119 2445 6 (0.25)
Chest x-ray findings
Normal 49 501 118 (23.6)
Patchy lesions 49 501 105 (21.0)
Ground-glass opacity 49 501 30 (6.0)
Consolidation 49 501 12 (2.4)
Computed Tomography (CT) findings
Ground-glass opacity 67 1115 367 (32.9)
Normal 67 1115 211 (18.9)
Patchy lesions 67 1115 117 (10.5)
Consolidation 67 1115 72 (6.5)

Complete blood counts were the most common laboratory results described (see Table 5). Overall, leukocytes were within normal values (7·1 × 103/μL), whereas neutrophils were mildly decreased (44·4%) while lymphocytes were marginally elevated (39·9%). Markers of liver and renal function were normal. Four serum inflammatory markers were above the mean: D-dimer, procalcitonin, creatine kinase, and interleukin-6.

Table 5.

Laboratory values.

# Studies # Patients Mean (SD)
Complete blood count
Leukocytes (103/µL) 63 811 7.1 (0.3)
(normal range 4.0-12.0)
Neutrophils (%) 43 512 44.4 (2.7)
(normal range 54-62)
Lymphocytes (%) 52 672 39.9 (2.0)
(normal range 25-33)
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 35 211 12.9 (0.9)
(normal range 11.5-14.5)
Platelets (103/µL) 38 115 272.5 (8.5)
(normal range 150-450)
Liver and renal function
Creatinine (mg/dL) 27 449 0.3 (0.0)
(normal range 0.22-0.59)
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) 32 469 29.4 (2.2)
(normal range 15-50)
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) 35 656 19.5 (1.0)
(normal range 5-45)
Urea (mg/dL) 12 227 4.6 (0.9)
(normal range 5-18)
Inflammatory markers
C-reactive protein (mg/L) 45 643 9.4 (0.5)
(male normal range 0.6-7.9)
(female normal range 0.5-10.0)
D-dimer (mg/L)* 16 285 0.7 (0.1)
(adult normal range <0.4)
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) 29 259 0.25 (0.0)
(normal range ≤0.15 ng/mL)
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) 25 404 276.6 (25.9)
(normal range 150-500)
Creatine kinase (U/L) 25 193 197.9 (23.1)
(adult normal range 5-130)
Fibrinogen (mg/dL)* 7 179 224.2 (1.3)
(normal range 220–440)
ESR (mm/h)* 7 134 14.1 (3.4)
(normal range 0-20)
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL) 9 92 26.1 (3.7)
(normal range ≤1.8)
Ferritin (ng/mL) 3 22 51.6 (13.2)
(normal range 10-60)

Given that the mean (SD) in our pediatric population was 8.9 ± 0.5 years we provide the lowest to highest numbers presented in children with a similar age range when possible (data from Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics 2019). *Gregory's Pediatric Anesthesia 2012 5th edition.

Mayo clinic laboratories.

Sixty-six studies (n=614 individuals) provided information regarding treatments. Interferon was the most commonly administered drug (41·0%), followed by empiric antibiotics (20·2%). Of note, glucocorticoids, and intravenous immunoglobulin was used in 4·1% and 3·1% of patients, respectively. Complications we evaluated were rare and only described in 21 studies. There were 7 cases of kidney failure (0·09%), 19 cases of shock (0·24%), and 42 children were intubated (0·54%). More details on treatments provided and complications can be found in Table 6.

TABLE 6.

Treatments and complications

# Studies # Patients N (%)
Treatments
Interferon 66 614 252 (41.0)
Antibiotics 66 614 124 (20.2)
Remdesivir/unspecified antiviral 66 614 134 (21.8)
Herbs/home remedies/other 66 614 126 (20.5)
Lopinavir/ritonavir 66 614 71 (11.6)
Oseltamivir 66 614 53 (8.6)
Hydroxychloroquine 66 614 48 (7.8)
Glucocorticoids 66 614 25 (4.1)
Intravenous immunoglobulin 66 614 19 (3.1)
Arbidol 66 614 16 (2.6)
Ribavirin 66 614 13 (2.1)
Tocilizumab 66 614 9 (1.5)
Complications
Death 131 7780 7 (0.09)
Mechanical ventilation 131 7780 42 (0.54)
Shock 131 7780 19 (0.24)
DIC 131 7780 9 (0.12)
Kidney failure 131 7780 9 (0.12)
Cardiac injury 131 7780 8 (0.10)
MIS-C 131 7780 11 (0.14)

Eleven patients (0·14%) met the CDC's criteria for MIS-C [7]. Compared to control (n=14), children with severe inflammation were more likely to present with dyspnea (72·7% vs 28·6%), vomiting (45·5% vs. 7·1%), and diarrhea (45·5% vs. 21·4%). White blood cell counts were comparable between the groups; however, patients with MIS-C have significant lymphopenia (11·1% vs. 41·8%). No difference was noted in platelets or liver function markers. Serum lactate dehydrogenase and D-dimer were higher in children with MIS-C (p<0·05, details provided in Table 7). Also, patients with MIS-C had lower expression of circulating CD16+CD56+ natural killer cells. Imaging findings and treatments were comparable in MIS-C and non-MIS-C patients.

Table 7.

Comparison between covid-19 children with and without multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).

COVID-19 MIS-C
Number of patients 14 11 NA
Age, years 7.5 (1.8, 13.7) 1.1 (0.7, 12.0) 0.15
Gender, male 10 (71.4%) 6 (54.5%) 0.43
Clinical characteristics
Fever 10 (71.4%) 10 (90.9%) 0.34
Cough 8 (57.1%) 6 (54.5%) 1.00
Dyspnea 4 (28.6%) 8 (72.7%) 0.04
Vomiting 1 (7.1%) 5 (45.5%) 0.02
Diarrhea 3 (21.4%) 5 (45.5%) 0.02
Underlying medical conditions 1 (7.1%) 3 (27.3%) 0.14
Laboratory parameters
White blood cell count (103/µL) 7.8 (4.6, 8.3) 9.0 (5.0, 11.3) 0.23
Neutrophils 49.4% (31.4, 65.4) 58.9% (55.3, 65) 0.25
Lymphocytes 41.8% (22.4, 53.8) 11.1% (5.9, 25.7) <0.01
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.6 (2.3) 12.1 (2.4) 0.66
Platelets (103/µL) 250 (173, 301) 193 (107, 251) 0.22
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) 23.0 (17.0, 37.0) 30.0 (18.8, 36.0) 0.96
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) 17.0 (11.0, 31.0) 26.6 (12.0, 55.0) 0.45
Creatine kinase (U/L) 77 (71, 113) 106 (62, 380) 0.45
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) 217 (203, 367) 459 (380, 609) <0.01
C-reactive protein (mg/L) 1.1 (0.5, 9.9) 13.3 (1, 57.9) 0.07
Interleukin-2 (pg/mL)* 2.6 (1.0) 1.4 (0.3) 0.06
Interleukin-4 (pg/mL)* 4.4 (1.5) 2.8 (0.8) 0.11
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)* 14.3 (4.8, 9.0) 118 (4.7, 25.4) 0.81
Interleukin-10 (pg/mL)* 6.9 (4.8, 9.0) 15.1 (4.7, 25) 0.56
Tumor necrosis alpha (pg/mL)* 4.3 (3.2, 5.4) 8.4 (1.4, 4.5) 0.46
Interferon gamma (pg/mL)* 8.6 (5.9, 15) 3.1 (1.5, 21) 0.25
CD16+CD56+* 11.0% (5.1) 4.2% (2.2) 0.03
CD3+* 72.0% (14.4) 60.0% (12.9) 0.23
CD4+* 29.4% (3.8) 34.7% (10.1) 0.36
D-dimer (mg/L)* 0.3 (0.3, 0.5) 40.3 (3.1, 11806) <0.01
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) 0.09 (0.09, 0.13) 0.11 (0.04, 0.83) 0.72
Imaging findings and treatment
Normal chest x-ray 7 (50%) 0 (0%) 0.15
Normal lung computed tomography 5 (35.7%) 0 (0%) 0.47
Interferon 5 (35.7%) 5 (45.5%) 0.23
Oseltamivir 3 (21.4%) 5 (45.5%) 1.00
Glucocorticoids 2 (14.3%) 6 (54.5%) 0.13
Intravenous immunoglobulin 3 (21.4%) 5 (45.5%) 1.00
Virazole 3 (21.4%) 4 (36.4%) 1.00
Tocilizumab 0 (0%) 2 (18.2%) 0.49

Data are presented as mean (SD) or median (IQR). Student's t test, Wilcoxon rank sum, or Fisher's exact was conducted as appropriate. * denotes limited data was in at least one group (D-dimer in MIS-C=3; Interleukins and CDs had 4 in non-MIS-C group vs. 4-5 in MIS-C).

Discussion

Over the last 6 months, there have been over 6·4 million worldwide cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and our knowledge of the disease and its epidemiologic and clinical characteristics continue to evolve [4]. However, since it was first reported in Wuhan city in December 2019, most studies have focused on symptomatic adults. In the presence of this rapidly emerging, novel infection, identification of clinical and laboratory characteristics in the pediatric population is essential to guide clinical care, predict disease severity, and determine prognosis. In this context, we performed the largest and most comprehensive systematic review of published studies involving pediatric patients with known COVID-19. Our systematic review summarized the clinical, laboratory and radiologic features of COVID-19 in neonates, children, and adolescents.

Our review also supports the findings by a recent systematic review by Castagnoli et al. [17] Their study included a total of 1,065 COVID-19 infected children and concluded that, by and large, the prognosis for children was excellent, demonstrated by only one death. Compared to that review and other COVID-19 pediatric systematic reviews, [[18], [19], [20], [21]21] this manuscript has several key advantages: (1) we summarize 131 studies that includes 7780 children from 26 different countries, (2) this report synthesizes underlying pediatric medical conditions and delineates bacterial and viral coinfections, (3) we quantitatively describe clinical symptoms and imaging findings, (4) herein, we conglomerate the mean and standard deviation of frequently used laboratory analytes in COVID-19 positive children, (5) our report presents antiviral therapies by specific agents, and (6) our systematic review offers a preliminary comparison of patients with/without MIS-C.

Although SARS-CoV-2 infection was first identified in China, the United States has now amassed the highest number of confirmed cases [18]. Calculations made on June 4th, 2020 from the COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for

Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University indicate that China has 4·5% of total confirmed COVID-19 cases compared to the United States [4]. As expected, the most common vector for childhood infection is close contact to an affected family member or residing in an area with a high population of cases. Our findings align with the results of an April 2020 report by Dong et al, in which there was a clear trend that the disease spread rapidly from a Chinese province to surrounding provinces and cities in children from December to February [22]. Furthermore, Qiu and colleagues studied 36 pediatric COVID-19 positive patients in which ten patients (28%) were asymptomatic latent cases identified secondary to an adult family member who was infected, symptomatic, or traveled to an endemic area [23]. This lends concern that children, who may be asymptomatic, may play a role in community transmission of the virus.

Results from this systematic review echo findings describing milder symptoms in pediatric cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection [17,21]. For instance, the most common clinical manifestations we found were fever (59·1%), cough (55·9%), rhinorrhea (20·0%) and myalgia/fatigue (18·7%). Unlike adults, children rarely progressed to severe upper respiratory symptoms requiring intensive care unit admission [24,25]. Although transmission rates for SARS-CoV-2 are high, symptoms are less severe than SARS/Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) infection [26].

Serum inflammatory markers, specifically D-dimer, procalcitonin, creatine kinase, and interleukin-6, were consistently abnormal in the studies included in this review. Alterations to acute-phase infection-related biomarkers are corroborated in adult case series and meta-analyses [27,28]. However, we must take caution when interpreting these outcomes and await more robust, longitudinal laboratory analyses. Again, these blood analyses are non-specific and may merely represent a pro-inflammatory state induced by the virus [26].

In terms of imaging findings, we found that most patients had normal chest x-rays, a finding that is not surprising as most pediatric patients did not present with respiratory symptoms. Paralleling this review, a meta-analysis of CT features for COVID-19, showed that diffuse bilateral ground-glass opacities were the most common finding at all stages of disease [29,30]. Despite these promising associations, it is important to consider that radiologic manifestations from various pathogens may have a similar impression and should be ruled out. Co-infections with other respiratory illnesses including influenza and mycoplasma were described in 72 patients. As elegantly described by Cox and colleagues, most fatalities from the 1918 influenza outbreak were secondary to bacterial infection [31]. Thus, future reports should not only describe coinfections but also detail pertinent negatives. At present, our study had a low rate of reporting the infectious workup (26·7) of patients. Illustrating the importance, one of two patients that died in the study by Shekerdemian et al was due to gram negative sepsis in a child with comorbidities who developed end organ failure [32].

Although most children have an uneventful course, a present concern is an inflammatory cascade in pediatric patients with COVID-19 [8,9]. Clinical presentation includes an unremitting high fever, and includes systemic signs such as rash, conjunctivitis, and/or gastrointestinal symptoms. The case series of eight children from London required respiratory assistance, whether it was oxygen support (n=1), noninvasive ventilation (n=2) or intubation and mechanical ventilation (n=4) [8]. One patient was so ill that he required mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In addition, all required vasopressor support and demonstrated elevated levels of ferritin, D-dimers, troponin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Additionally, cardiac imaging showed ventricular dysfunction in five children. In another article, Italian investigators describe ten patients with MIS-C. Correspondingly, they describe patients manifesting with fever, diarrhea (n=6), and abnormal echocardiograms (n=6). Laboratory specifics showed elevated CRP, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated ferritin levels [9].

We found evidence of MIS-C features in 11 children who also presented with fever (n=11), dyspnea (n=8), and diarrhea (n=6). According to Riphagen and Verdoni, lymphopenia was marked in our cohort of patients, as well as increased levels of lactate dehydrogenase, CRP and D-dimer [8,9]. Despite low numbers we did observe an interesting lower level of CD16+CD56+ natural killer (NK) cells in patients with MIS-C. Both lymphopenia and a reduced number/activity of NK cells in adults has correlated with a more severe COVID-19 disease progression [[33], [34], [35]36].

Little is known about the perinatal aspects of COVID-19, and there have been several reported cases of neonatal infection, suggesting a possible perinatal or vertical transmission during pregnancy [37]. However, in a report by Chen et al., all nine neonates born to COVID-19 positive mothers tested negative for the virus after cesarean delivery [38]. In another study by Zhang et al., 10 neonates from COVID-19 positive mother all tested negative for the infection [39]. Moreover, this is further supported by analysis of breast milk and placental pathologic specimens from COVID-19 positive mothers, which have returned negative for the virus [40,41]. Lastly, vertical transmission was not observed with either SARS-CoV-1 or in MERS-CoV;[41] therefore, it is unlikely that maternal vertical transmission during third trimester occurs, or is likely very rare. However, from the limited data published, we cannot determine the consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy and if it can be transmitted to the fetus and hinder organ development, malformations, growth abnormalities, or even lead to premature labor or spontaneous abortions [42,43]. Also, Dong et al communicated an alarming finding in which the proportion of severe and critical cases were higher in neonates when compared to the >16-year-old age group (10·6% vs. 3·0%) [44]. As a community, we must stay vigilant, practice social distancing, hand wash frequently, and be especially careful with our children who are at potentially higher risk for critical disease (e.g. multiple comorbidities, weakened immune systems, etc.).

There are several limitations to this review. First, many of the included studies were case reports or cases with low patient numbers. Second, the level of evidence for all the studies was low. Next, we unified the laboratory data to mean and standard deviation. There are inherent issues when using averages including the impact of outliers. We did not include suspected cases, which would allow for a direct comparison of symptoms, labs, imaging, and outcome data. Of concern, many of the studies were incomplete and did not include a comprehensive picture of the patients. Future studies should not generalize data (“CBC was normal”), or categorize laboratory values (i.e., number of patients with elevated CRP), or group therapies (i.e., patient received “antiviral therapy”), or display aggregate data between adults and children. If feasible, divide the symptoms, laboratory markers, and imaging characteristics by children vs. adults. A better understanding of COVID-19 requires access to data, even if it is provided in the appendix or supplementary section of the article. In this way, we will be able to identify the best biomarkers that can stratify disease severity and potential short- and long-term outcomes. Another limitation, is that we had a small number of patients that fit the criteria for MIS-C. Reasons for the small number of patients includes a lack of reporting all of the signs, symptoms, and laboratory markers necessary to make the diagnosis (especially duration of fever). Missing information for laboratory markers (D-dimer, interleukins, and CD%) hinders our preliminary findings. Lastly, the literature focusing on COVID-19 is very dynamic and growing rapidly and we expect the rates, especially for MIS-C, of our outcomes to change.

Contributors

Ansel Hoang-literature search, study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, manuscript writing, risk of bias, tables. Kevin Chorath-literature search, study design, data collection, data interpretation, manuscript writing, risk of bias. Axel Moreira-literature search, study design, data collection, manuscript writing, data interpretation, risk of bias. Mary Evans-data collection, verifying data integrity, risk of bias. Finn Burmeister-Morton-data collection, verifying data integrity. Fiona Burmeister-data collection, verifying data integrity, risk of bias. Rija Naqvi-data collection, verifying data integrity, risk of bias. Matthew Petershack-data collection, risk of bias. Alvaro Moreira-literature search, study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, manuscript writing, figure, tables, oversight.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgments

Funding sources: Parker B. Francis; Pilot grant 2R25-HL126140. Funding agencies had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100433.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.pdf (504.1KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Du Z, Wang L, Cauchemez S. Risk for transportation of coronavirus disease from Wuhan to other cities in china. Emerg Infect Dis J. 2020;26:1049. doi: 10.3201/eid2605.200146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gao Q, Hu Y, dai Sr Z, Wu J, Xiao F, Wang J. The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in Jingmen, Hubei. China. 2020;10 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.07.20031393. March. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares covid-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91:157–160. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johns Hopkins University and Medicine. Coronavirus resource center. Coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessedJune3, 2020).
  • 5.WHO. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report-28, 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200217-sitrep-28-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=a19cf2ad_2(accessed May 13, 2020).
  • 6.Wang E, Brar K. COVID-19 in children: an epidemiology study from China. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.024. April 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Resources for Emergency Health Professionals. Health Alert Netw. 2020 https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2020/han00432.asp (accessed June 3. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Riphagen S, Gomez X, Gonzales-Martinez C, Wilkinson N, Theocharis P. Hyperinflammatory shock in children during COVID-19 pandemic Lancet2020; May 7. DOI:10.106/S0140-6736(20)31094-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Verdoni L, Mazza A, Gerasoni A. An outbreak of severe Kawasaki-like disease at the Italian epicentre of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31103-X. May 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.National Institutes of Health (2014) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. June 3, 2020 (accessed. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Farrah K, Young K, Tunis M, Zhao L. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols. Syst Rev. 2019;1:280. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1172-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1989;95:2S–4S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bialek S, Gierke R, Hughes M, McNamara LA, Pilishvili T, Skoff T. Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Children — United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020February 12–April 2; 69:422-426. DOI:10.15585/mmwr.mm6914e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Wang J, Wang D, Chen GC, Tao XW, Zeng LK. SARS-CoV-2 infection with gastrointestinal symptoms as the first manifestation in a neonate. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020;22:211–214. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2020.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zeng L, Xia S, Yuan W. Neonatal early-onset infection with SARS-CoV-2 in 33 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0878. March 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Castagnoli R, Votto M, Licari A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children and adolescents: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1467. April 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Souza T, Nadal J, Nogueira R, Pereira R, Brandao M. Clinical manifestations of children with COVID-19: a systematic review. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/ppul.24885. June 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Panahi L, Amiri M, Pouy S. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 infection in newborns and pediatrics: a systematic review. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020;18:e50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mustafa N, Selim L. Characterisation of COVID-19 pandemic in paediatric age group: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104395. May 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ludvigsson J. Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109:1088–1095. doi: 10.1111/apa.15270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y. Epidemiological characteristics of 2143 pediatric patients with 2019 coronavirus disease in china. Pediatrics. 2020 doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0702. March 17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qiu H, Wu J, Hong L, Luo Y, Song Q, Chen D. Clinical and epidemiological features of 36 children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Zhejiang. China Observat Cohort Study Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30198-5. March 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Gutiérrez-Ocampo E. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623. March 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. China Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thabet F, Chehab M, Bafaqih H, Almohaimeed S. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus in children. Saudi Med J. 2015;36:484–486. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.4.10243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aziz M, Fatima R, Assaly R. Elevated interleukin-6 and severe COVID-19: a meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25948. April 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhu J, Ji P, Pang J. Clinical characteristics of 3,062 COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25884. April 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xia W, Shao J, Guo Y, Peng X, Li Z, Hu D. Clinical and CT features in pediatric patients with COVID-19 infection: Different points from adults. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55:1169–1174. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kumar-Venugopal V, Mahajan V, Rajan S, et al. A systematic meta-analysis of CT features of covid-19: lessons from radiology, 2020; April 7. DOI:10.1101/2020.04.04.20052241.
  • 31.Cox M, Loman N, Bogaert D, O'Grady J. Co-infections: potentially lethal and unexplored in COVID19. Lancet. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30009-4. April 2410.1016/S2666-5247(20)30009-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shekerdemian L, Mahmood N, Wolfe K, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection admitted to US and Canadian pediatric intensive care units. JAMA Pediatr; May 11. DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.L Antonioli, Fornai M, Pellegrini C. Blandizzi C. NKG2A and COVID-19: another brick in the wall. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17:672–674. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0450-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vabret N, Britton G, Gruber C. Immunology of COVID-19: current state of the science. Immunity. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.002. March 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tan L. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0159-1. April 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Huang G, Kovalic AJ, Graber CJ. Prognostic value of leukocytosis and lymphopenia for coronavirus disease severity. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.3201/edi2608.201160. May 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dong L, Tian J, He S. Possible vertical transmission of sars-cov-2 from an infected mother to her newborn. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4621. March 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen H, Guo J, Wang C. Clinical characteristics, and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records. Lancet. 2020;395:809–815. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang L, Jiang Y, Wei M. [Analysis of the pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19 in Hubei Province] Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020;55:E009. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200218-00111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zheng F, Liao C, Fan Q. Clinical characteristics of children with coronavirus disease 2019 in Hubei. China Curr Med Sci. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2172-6. March 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen S, Huang B, Luo DJ. [Pregnant women with new coronavirus infection: a clinical characteristics and placental pathological analysis of three cases] Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi. 2020;49:E005. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20200225-00138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rasmussen SA, Smulian JC, Lednicky JA, Wen TS, Jamieson DJ. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: what obstetricians need to know. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.017. February 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mimouni F, Lakshminrusimha S, Pearlman SA, Raju T, Gallagher PG, Mendlovic J. Perinatal aspects on the covid-19 pandemic: a practical resource for perinatal-neonatal specialists. J Perinatol. 2020;40:820–826. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0665-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dong Y, X Mo, Hu Y. Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children in China. Pediatrics. 2020 doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0702. March 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.pdf (504.1KB, pdf)

Articles from EClinicalMedicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES