Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;86(7):1406–1415. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14254

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of patients with metamizole‐induced liver injury

Group of metamizole‐induced DILI cases n Age Sex Time of follow‐up RUCAM score Re‐challenge Concurrent causative medication Presence of ANA ANA titre Biochemical pattern (R) Latency HE Steroid treatment Infectious complications
y Female/male mo Hepatocellular/mixed/cholestatic Weeks
All 23 40 (26–79) 15/23 (65.2%) 4.5 7 (4–11) 4/23 (17.4%) 6/23 (26.1%) 12/23 (52.2%) 1:160 (1:80–1:5120) 14/4/5 4 (1–135) 2/23 (8.7%) 16/23 (69.6%) 0/23 (0%)
Recovery 21 40 (26–79) 14/2 (54.5) 4.5 7 (4–11) 4/21 (19.0%) 4/21 (19%) 11/21 (52.4%) 1:160 (1:160–1:5120) 13/4/4 4.5 (1–135) 0/21 (0%) 14/21 (66.7%) 0/21 (0%)
ALF and LTX 2 50 (33–67) 1/2 (50%) 1 (until LTX) 8 (7–8) 0/2 (0%) 2/2 (100%) 1/2 (50%) 1:80 1/0/1 6 (4–8) 2/2 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 0/2 (0%)

ALF, acute liver failure; ANA, anti‐nuclear antibodies; HE, hepatic encephalopathy; DILI, drug‐induced liver injury; LTX, liver transplantation; RUCAM, Roussel UCLAF Causality Assessment Method (possible 4–5; probable 6–8; highly probable >8).