Table 2.
Summary of genetic diversity in the five Vitaceae species present along the Buffalo River.
| Pop | Na | Ne | Ho | He | I | %P | PAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V. aestivalis | Mean | 5.739 | 4.390 | 0.740 | 0.726 | 1.515 | 100.00% | 23 |
| SE | 0.437 | 0.341 | 0.060 | 0.030 | 0.092 | |||
| V. cinerea / | Mean | 6.261 | 3.963 | 0.570 | 0.610 | 1.330 | 95.65% | 40 |
| V.berlandieri | SE | 0.709 | 0.517 | 0.058 | 0.057 | 0.148 | ||
| M. rotundifolia | Mean | 2.957 | 2.145 | 0.349 | 0.352 | 0.673 | 60.87% | 28 |
| SE | 0.489 | 0.334 | 0.080 | 0.070 | 0.140 | |||
| V. riparia | Mean | 13.957 | 6.696 | 0.687 | 0.762 | 1.992 | 100.00% | 136 |
| SE | 1.143 | 0.836 | 0.046 | 0.040 | 0.140 | |||
| V. rupestris | Mean | 3.739 | 3.213 | 0.713 | 0.674 | 1.213 | 100.00% | 10 |
| SE | 0.144 | 0.142 | 0.063 | 0.016 | 0.044 |
Na, number of alleles; Ne, effective number of alleles; Ho and He, observed and expected heterozygosities, respectively; I, Shannon's Information Index; %P, percentage of polymorphic loci; PAL, number of private alleles per species.