Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 26;23(Suppl 2):e25518. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25518

Table 5.

Associations between latent class membership and HIV service use

  Tested for HIV in last 12 months (n = 513) b Circumcised (n = 939) HIV treatment literacy score (range 0 to 5) (n = 944) Currently taking antiretroviral therapy (n = 80) c
n (%) aPR (95% CI) n (%) aPR (95% CI) Mean ± SD aIRR (95% CI) n (%) aPR (95% CI)
Full sample 337 (65.7%) 576 (61.3%) 3.55 ± 1.00 73 (91.3%)
Older high‐risk 57 (65.5%) 0.97 (0.79, 1.19) 83 (45.1%) 0.61 (0.51, 0.73)*** 3.56 ± 1.00 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) 27 (90.0%) d
Younger high‐risk 89 (64.0%) 0.95 (0.82, 1.10) 130 (55.6%) 0.75 (0.68, 0.84)*** 3.38 ± 1.06 0.94 (0.88, 1.01) 16 (88.9%) d
Younger moderate‐risk 138 (67.7%) ref 252 (74.3%) ref 3.57 ± 1.03 ref 9 (90.0%) d
Older low‐risk 53 (63.9%) 0.94 (0.78, 1.13) 111 (61.0%) 0.83 (0.71, 0.95)* 3.72 ± 0.81 1.05 (0.98, 1.11) 21 (95.5%) d
Overall p‐value a 0.89 <0.001 0.18 0.88

Analyses adjusted for recruitment site.

a

Overall p‐value represents overall statistical significance of difference between groups, based on Pearson’s chi‐square test.

b

Among venue‐based sample only, since service‐based sample included many coming for HIV testing. Excluded men who reported initiating ART (i.e., were diagnosed) over 12 months ago.

c

Four of the 84 HIV‐positive men did not provide a valid response regarding current ART use.

d

Small sample sizes for each class precluded testing significance of differences between them.

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; significance of comparisons with the reference category (ref; selected based on youngest mean age of the latent class).

aIRR, adjusted incidence rate ratio; aPR, adjusted prevalence ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.