Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 26;15(6):e0234871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234871

Table 1. Display of the distribution of the outcome variables.

N denotes the sample size used for each outcome, while Positive and Negative denote the balance of the data.

Outcome Variable N Positive Negative
Molecular breast cancer subtypes
Luminal A 95 58 (61%) 37 (39%)
Luminal B 95 16 (17%) 79 (83%)
HER2-enriched 95 6 (6%) 89 (94%)
Triple-Negative 95 15 (16%) 80 (84%)
Differentiation of Molecular breast cancer subtypes
Luminal A vs Luminal B 74 58 (78%) 16 (22%)
Luminal A vs HER2-enriched 64 58 (91%) 6 (9%)
Luminal A vs Triple- Negative 73 58 (79%) 15 (21%)
Luminal B vs HER2-enriched 22 16 (73%) 6 (27%)
Luminal B vs Triple- Negative 31 16 (52%) 15 (48%)
HER2-enriched vs Triple-Negative 21 6 (29%) 15 (71%)
Receptor status
Estrogen Receptor (ER) 95 73 (77%) 22 (23%)
Progesterone Receptor (PR) 95 66 (69%) 29 (31%)
Hormone receptor positivity 95 74 (78%) 21 (22%)
Ki67- and HER2-Expression
Ki67 80 20 (25%) 60 (75%)
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) 95 22 (23%) 73 (77%)
Involvement of the lymphatic system
Lymph Vessel Involvement 51 8 (16%) 43 (84%)
Lymph Node Metastasis 84 34 (40%) 50 (60%)
Grading
Elston-Ellis Grading (EE) 57 44 (77%) 13 (23%)
Histological Grading 90 18 (20%) 72 (80%)