Table III.
Adjusted associations between perceived risk of getting HIV and ≥80% PrEP adherence
| Risk perception | Overall |
Women | Men | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na (%) with adherence to PrEPc | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | Na (%) with adherence to PrEPc | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | Na (%) with adherence to PrEPc | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
| Highb | 40 (83.3) | 0.9 (0.7, 1.3) | 20 (90.9) | 0.8 (0.4, 1.3) | 20 (76.9) | 1.0 (0.7, 1.6) |
| Moderateb | 69 (92.0) | 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) | 34 (97.1) | 1.2 (0.7, 2.0) | 35 (87.5) | 1.1(0.8, 1.5) |
| Lowb | 213 (87.7) | 1.2 (1.0, 1.4) | 88 (88.9) | 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) | 125 (86.8) | 1.3 (1.0, 1.6) |
| Don’t knowb | 49 (84.5) | 0.9 (0.7, 1.2) | 30 (96.8) | 0.9 (0.5, 1.8) | 19 (70.4) | 0.8 (0.6, 1.2) |
| None | 210 (89.0) | Reference | 58 (89.2) | Reference | 152 (88.9) | Reference |
a
N = number of observations over the duration of the study
b
OR (95% CI) adjusted for any condomless sex, age, gender (only in overall model), married/cohabiting, mean social support, years serodiscordant status was known, abuse by study partner, alcohol dependence and probable depression.
c
Adherence to PrEP = observed divided by expected number of MEMS cap openings ≥80%