Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;24:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.05.006

Table 4.

Correlation coefficient of linear regression between the subchondral microstructure and biomechanical properties in the OA, OP and NC groups.

Microstructure OA (n = 13)
OP (n = 17)
NC (n = 8)
Stiffness Failure Load Stiffness Failure Load Stiffness Failure Load
Standard micro-CT
BV/TV (%) 0.95∗∗ 0.98∗∗ 0.89∗∗ 0.86∗∗ 0.84∗∗ 0.74∗
Tb.N (1/mm) 0.92∗∗ 0.93∗∗ 0.56∗ 0.52∗ 0.58 0.46
Tb.Th (mm) 0.67∗ 0.69∗∗ 0.69∗∗ 0.68∗∗ 0.65 0.65
Tb.Sp −0.83∗∗ −0.85∗∗ −0.48 −0.46 −0.28 −0.17
SMI −0.89∗∗ −0.91∗∗ −0.90∗∗ −0.91∗∗ −0.92∗∗ −0.88∗∗
Conn.D (1/mm3) 0.82∗∗ 0.85∗∗ 0.29 0.24 0.38 0.26
ITS-based micro-CT
aBV/TV (%) 0.98∗∗ 0.97∗∗ 0.90∗∗ 0.87∗∗ 0.90∗∗ 0.84∗∗
pBV/TV (%) 0.96∗∗ 0.97∗∗ 0.87∗∗ 0.84∗∗ 0.92∗∗ 0.84∗∗
rBV/TV (%) 0.80∗∗ 0.85∗∗ 0.17 0.15 −0.57 −0.6
pTb.N (1/mm) 0.82∗∗ 0.83∗∗ 0.58∗ 0.53∗ 0.87∗∗ 0.82∗
rTb.N (1/mm) 0.86∗∗ 0.88∗∗ 0.08 0.04 0.55 0.47
pTb.Th (mm) 0.88∗∗ 0.88∗∗ 0.70∗∗ 0.68∗∗ −0.34 −0.34
rTb.Th (mm) 0.31 0.37 0.13 0.16 −0.91∗∗ −0.91∗∗
pTb.S (mm2) 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.39 −0.62 −0.61
rTb.l (mm) 0.66∗ 0.71∗∗ 0.09 0.14 −0.89∗∗ −0.88∗∗
R–R Junc.D (1/mm3) 0.67∗ 0.72∗∗ −0.18 −0.21 0.24 0.15
R–P Junc.D (1/mm3) 0.95∗∗ 0.96∗∗ 0.50∗ 0.44 0.78∗ 0.68
P–P Junc.D (1/mm3) 0.87∗∗ 0.88∗∗ 0.54∗ 0.49∗ 0.79∗ 0.71
μFEA
Stiffness (kN/mm) 1 0.987∗∗ 1 1∗∗ 1 0.98∗∗
Failure Load (MPa) 0.99∗∗ 1 1∗∗ 1 0.98∗∗ 1
OARSI −0.29 −0.24 −0.22 −0.22 −0.33 −0.42

∗p < 0.05.

∗∗p < 0.01.

a = axial; BV = bone volume; Conn.D = connenctivity density; CT = computed tomography; ITS = ; NC = normal control; OA = osteoarthritis; OP = osteoporosis. p = plate; P–P Junc.D = plate–plate junction density; r = rod; R–P Junc.D = rod–plate junction density; R–R Junc.D = rod–rod junction density; SMI = structure model index; Tb.l = trabecular length; Tb.N = trabecular number; Tb.S = trabecular surface area; Tb.Sp = trabecular separation; Tb.Th = trabecular thickness; TV = total volume.