Table 4.
Authors | Year of publication & place | Study setting | Study design | Sample size | MDR rate (%) | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present study | 2011–12 New Delhi, India | Lala Ram Sarup District with 12 Designated Microscopy Centres. Population of 0.8 million | Drug resistance estimation to first and second line anti-tubercular agents among new cases | 450 | 4.00 | |
Sharma et al. | 2008–2009 New Delhi, India | Designated Microscopy Centre at Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital | Drug resistance estimation to first line anti-tubercular agents among sputum positive cases | 218 | 1.10 | [5] |
D’Souza et al. | 2004–7 Mumbai, India | Four central wards in Mumbai with high sputum-positive case load. Population 3 million | Levels of drug resistance to first line anti-tubercular agents in new and first line treatment-failure cases | 493 | 24 | [13] |
Joseph et al. | 2006 Kerala, India | Ernakulam District | Level of drug resistance to first line anti-tubercular agents among new smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases | 344 | 2 | [14] |
Ramachandran et al. | 2005 Gujarat, India | State of Gujarat. 56 million population | Drug resistant survey to first and second line anti-tubercular agents on representative samples of new and previously treated pulmonary TB | 1571 | 2.40 | [15] |
Paramasivan et al. | 2002 Tamil Nadu & Karnataka, India | 23 centres in North Arcot district and 20 centres in Raichur district | Levels of drug resistance to first line anti-tuberculars and ofloxacin in new and previously treated cases of pulmonary TB | 320, 314 | 3 | [16] |
Jain et al. | 2000–2, Lucknow, India | One Primary Level Centre and one District Tuberculosis Centre and One Tertiary Centre Hospital | Prevalence of multi-drug resistance in three different levels of health care | 1014 | 13.20 | [17] |
Jain et al. | 1990–91, New Delhi, India | Intermediate Reference Laboratory | Retrospective study of drug resistance levels to first line anti-tubercular agents in new and previously treated | NA | 0.60 | [18] |
NA: not available.