Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;98(6):skaa156. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa156

Table 3.

Relative abundance of bacterial genera detected in fecal samples at 10 DPI1

Treatment
Bacterial genus by phyla2 NEG POS ISF P-value
Bacteroidetes
 Alloprevotella 4.46 ± 0.77 4.18 ± 0.81 3.32 ± 0.87 0.399
 dgA-11 gut group 0.58 ± 0.30 0.79 ± 0.22 1.07 ± 0.46 0.563
  (F) Muribaculaceae Porphyromonadaceae Unassigned 2.46 ± 0.39 5.98 ± 3.15 3.31 ± 0.73 0.593
  (F) Muribaculaceae Unassigned 0.53 ± 0.16 1.08 ± 0.35 0.65 ± 0.15 0.243
 Prevotella 1 2.52 ± 1.20 2.26 ± 0.57 2.52 ± 0.43 0.914
 Prevotella 2 2.80 ± 0.32 2.30 ± 0.39 1.78 ± 0.21 0.100
 Prevotella 9 18.4 ± 3.19a 9.56 ± 1.75b 7.63 ± 1.15b 0.002
 Prevotellaceae NK3B31 group 1.71 ± 0.35b 3.64 ± 0.63ab 3.97 ± 0.61a 0.040
 Prevotellaceae UCG-003 3.31 ± 0.91 4.28 ± 0.72 4.97 ± 0.86 0.408
  (F) Prevotellaceae Unassigned 2.68 ± 0.37a 1.71 ± 0.28a 0.79 ± 0.15b <0.001
 Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group 7.25 ± 1.10 7.09 ± 2.72 7.79 ± 1.86 0.804
Firmicutes
 Acidaminococcus 1.14 ± 0.39 0.69 ± 0.27 1.49 ± 0.83 0.723
 Agathobacter 1.48 ± 0.32 3.55 ± 1.75 1.78 ± 0.51 0.574
 Anaerovibrio 1.25 ± 0.27a 0.65 ± 0.21ab 0.42 ± 0.14b 0.011
 Dialister 2.83 ± 0.90a 1.40 ± 0.40ab 0.52 ± 0.13b 0.011
 Faecalibacterium 1.53 ± 0.50 0.76 ± 0.18 0.62 ± 0.10 0.099
 Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group 1.23 ± 0.22 3.15 ± 0.88 2.82 ± 0.58 0.111
  (F) Lachnospiraceae Unassigned 1.91 ± 0.48 2.37 ± 0.69 2.67 ± 1.07 0.869
 Lactobacillus 5.72 ± 1.48 3.42 ± 0.65 3.78 ± 0.74 0.604
 Megasphaera 4.14 ± 1.19 5.85 ± 1.85 5.21 ± 1.94 0.865
 Roseburia 0.41 ± 0.16 0.78 ± 0.27 1.38 ± 0.59 0.246
 Ruminococcaceae UCG-002 2.71 ± 0.37 1.51 ± 0.21 2.31 ± 0.51 0.173
  (F) Veillonellaceae Unassigned 2.05 ± 0.45 1.43 ± 0.47 1.94 ± 0.44 0.319
Proteobacteria
 Campylobacter 1.58 ± 0.39 3.52 ± 1.37 2.31 ± 0.72 0.546
 Succinivibrio 3.28 ± 1.27 7.81 ± 2.25 7.82 ± 1.88 0.155
Spirochaetes
 Treponema 2 1.04 ± 0.48 1.67 ± 0.46 4.64 ± 1.57 0.060

1Data are expressed as least-square mean ± SEM for each treatment group.

2Only genera with at least one mean with >1.0% relative abundance were considered for interpretation. Bacterial genera names preceded by (F) indicates that genera are associated with a specific taxonomic family and has not yet been further classified.

a,bMeans without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).