Table 4.
Percent relative abundance of bacterial phyla detected in fecal samples at 144 DPI1
| Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial phyla2 | NEG | POS | ISF | P-value |
| Actinobacteria | 0.43 ± 0.11a | 0.20 ± 0.03b | 0.24 ± 0.05ab | 0.049 |
| Bacteroidetes | 30.6 ± 1.88 | 29.2 ± 1.09 | 29.3 ± 1.30 | 0.787 |
| Elusimicrobia | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.49 ± 0.23 | 0.109 |
| Firmicutes | 30.1 ± 2.37 | 27.9 ± 1.27 | 30.1 ± 1.67 | 0.593 |
| Kiritimatiellaeota | 0.86 ± 0.18 | 1.33 ± 0.19 | 1.26 ± 0.18 | 0.129 |
| Proteobacteria | 25.3 ± 2.73 | 23.7 ± 2.44 | 18.7 ± 1.96 | 0.185 |
| Spirochaetes | 12.2 ± 2.69 | 16.9 ± 2.79 | 19.0 ± 3.14 | 0.346 |
1Data are expressed as least-square mean ± SEM for each treatment group.
2Only phyla with at least one mean with >0.30% relative abundance were considered for interpretation.
a,bMeans without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).