Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;98(6):skaa156. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa156

Table 4.

Percent relative abundance of bacterial phyla detected in fecal samples at 144 DPI1

Treatment
Bacterial phyla2 NEG POS ISF P-value
Actinobacteria 0.43 ± 0.11a 0.20 ± 0.03b 0.24 ± 0.05ab 0.049
Bacteroidetes 30.6 ± 1.88 29.2 ± 1.09 29.3 ± 1.30 0.787
Elusimicrobia 0.05 ± 0.02 0.20 ± 0.05 0.49 ± 0.23 0.109
Firmicutes 30.1 ± 2.37 27.9 ± 1.27 30.1 ± 1.67 0.593
Kiritimatiellaeota 0.86 ± 0.18 1.33 ± 0.19 1.26 ± 0.18 0.129
Proteobacteria 25.3 ± 2.73 23.7 ± 2.44 18.7 ± 1.96 0.185
Spirochaetes 12.2 ± 2.69 16.9 ± 2.79 19.0 ± 3.14 0.346

1Data are expressed as least-square mean ± SEM for each treatment group.

2Only phyla with at least one mean with >0.30% relative abundance were considered for interpretation.

a,bMeans without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).