Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;98(6):skaa156. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa156

Table 5.

Relative abundance of bacterial genera detected in fecal samples at 144 DPI1

Treatment
Bacterial genus by phyla2 NEG POS ISF P-value
Bacteroidetes
 Bacteroides 1.09 ± 0.21 0.79 ± 0.17 0.99 ± 0.21 0.445
 CAG-873 2.98 ± 1.49a 0.33 ± 0.12b 0.16 ± 0.05b <0.001
 dgA-11 gut group 0.88 ± 0.26 1.29 ± 0.45 1.53 ± 0.44 0.576
  (F) Muribaculaceae Porphyromonadaceae Unassigned 1.30 ± 0.40 1.38 ± 0.38 1.12 ± 0.30 0.871
  (F) Muribaculaceae Unassigned 3.20 ± 0.40 2.93 ± 0.66 2.41 ± 0.37 0.372
 Parabacteroides 1.10 ± 0.15 0.75 ± 0.09 1.16 ± 0.16 0.149
 Prevotella 1 0.68 ± 0.15 1.09 ± 0.19 1.59 ± 0.53 0.141
 Prevotellaceae NK3B31 group 5.63 ± 1.19 5.66 ± 0.54 6.66 ± 0.82 0.599
 Prevotellaceae UCG-001 3.35 ± 0.63 5.44 ± 0.94 4.24 ± 0.64 0.306
 Prevotellaceae UCG-004 1.13 ± 0.22a 0.59 ± 0.05b 0.55 ± 0.06b 0.002
 Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group 4.70 ± 0.47 4.33 ± 0.73 3.57 ± 0.42 0.337
Firmicutes
 Christensenellaceae R-7 group 3.43 ± 0.83 2.62 ± 0.50 2.10 ± 0.27 0.363
  (F) Christensenellaceae Unassigned 0.79 ± 0.27 1.87 ± 0.31 2.15 ± 0.61 0.085
 Clostridium sensu stricto 1 1.26 ± 0.24a 1.15 ± 0.21a 0.64 ± 0.09b 0.038
 Family XIII AD3011 group 1.03 ± 0.18 1.63 ± 0.44 1.55 ± 0.28 0.471
 Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group 2.59 ± 0.64 1.75 ± 0.46 1.35 ± 0.30 0.155
  (F) Lachnospiraceae Unassigned 1.60 ± 0.32b 2.87 ± 0.51ab 3.17 ± 0.50a 0.044
 Lachnospiraceae XPB1014 group 2.07 ± 0.42a 1.05 ± 0.23b 1.12 ± 0.22ab 0.039
 Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 group 2.19 ± 0.23 2.08 ± 0.31 1.78 ± 0.15 0.470
 Ruminococcaceae UCG-002 1.54 ± 0.31a 0.83 ± 0.15b 0.92 ± 0.12ab 0.039
 Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 2.09 ± 0.40 1.49 ± 0.20 1.58 ± 0.17 0.266
 Ruminococcaceae UCG-014 0.45 ± 0.10b 0.79 ± 0.11ab 1.12 ± 0.25a 0.043
 Ruminococcus 1 1.21 ± 0.36 1.01 ± 0.12 1.21 ± 0.17 0.782
  (F) Veillonellaceae Unassigned 1.93 ± 0.64 1.07 ± 0.28 1.93 ± 0.45 0.170
Proteobacteria
 Succinivibrio 21.8 ± 3.06 18.3 ± 2.26 12.7 ± 1.99 0.060
 Succinivibrionaceae UCG-001 2.77 ± 1.68 4.40 ± 1.35 4.20 ± 1.05 0.481
Spirochaetes
 Treponema 2 12.2 ± 2.68 16.9 ± 2.78 19.0 ± 3.14 0.348

1Data are expressed as least-square mean ± SEM for each treatment group.

2Only genera with at least one mean with >1.0% relative abundance were considered for interpretation. Bacterial genera names preceded by (F) indicates that genera are associated with a specific taxonomic family and has not yet been further classified.

a,bMeans without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05.