Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;12(2):97–105. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2020.17

Table 5. Association between components of metabolic syndrome and dietary energy density .

DED
β±SE 95% CI R 2 P value
TG (mg/dL)
Model 1 -0.04±0.0001 0.0001,0.0001 0.002 0.53
Model 2 -0.03±0.0001 0.0001,0.0001 0.02 0.62
SBP (mm Hg)
Model 1 -0.14±0.001 -0.003,0.0001 0.02 0.02
Model 2 -0.14±0.001 -0.003,0.0001 0.04 0.03
DBP (mm Hg)
Model 1 -0.16±0.001 -0.005,-0.001 0.02 0.01
Model 2 -0.17±0.001 -0.005,-0.001 0.05 0.01
FBS (mg/dL)
Model 1 0.12±0.0001 0.0001,0.002 0.01 0.07
Model 2 0.13±0.0001 0.0001,0.002 0.04 0.06
HDL-C (mg/dL)
Model 1 0.008±0.001 -0.002,0.003 0.0001 0.90
Model 2 -0.02±0.001 -0.003,0.002 0.02 0.72
WC (cm)
Model 1 -0.07±0.002 -0.005,0.002 0.005 029
Model 2 -0.07±0.002 -0.005,0.002 0.02 0.28

β: standardized coefficients, SE: standard error, CI: confidence interval, R2: R square, DED: dietary energy density, TG: triglyceride, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, FBS: fasting blood sugar, HDL-C: high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, WC: waist circumference.

P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. P value obtained from Linear regression.

Model 1: Crude.

Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, socioeconomic status, physical activity and energy.