Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 30;39(2):180–191. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.20.016

Table 3.

Comparison of adverse study outcomes between the study groups according to changes in MetS components

Model 1a Model 2b


Adjusted HR (95% CI) P value Adjusted HR (95% CI) P value
Incidental CKD
Developed components (in MetS-developed vs. MetS-free)
Central obesity 1.23 (1.17-1.29) <0.001 1.24 (1.18-1.31) <0.001
High blood pressure 1.36 (1.29-1.44) <0.001 1.37 (1.29-1.44) <0.001
Impaired fasting glucose 1.20 (1.15-1.26) <0.001 1.25 (1.19-1.31) <0.001
Dyslipidemia, Tg 1.30 (1.25-1.34) <0.001 1.27 (1.22-1.31) <0.001
Dyslipidemia, HDL 1.29 (1.25-1.34) <0.001 1.28 (1.24-1.33) <0.001
Recovered components (in MetS-recovery vs. MetS-chronic)
Central obesity 0.73 (0.69-0.78) <0.001 0.71 (0.67-0.76) <0.001
High blood pressure 0.65 (0.61-0.69) <0.001 0.65 (0.61-0.69) <0.001
Impaired fasting glucose 0.71 (0.67-0.75) <0.001 0.73 (0.68-0.770) <0.001
Dyslipidemia, Tg 0.71 (0.68-0.74) <0.001 0.71 (0.68-0.74) <0.001
Dyslipidemia, HDL 0.81 (0.77-0.84) <0.001 0.78 (0.75-0.82) <0.001
Albuminuria
Developed components (in MetS-developed vs. MetS-free)
Central obesity 1.73 (1.65-1.83) <0.001 1.72 (1.63-1.81) <0.001
High blood pressure 2.34 (2.22-2.46) <0.001 2.24 (2.13-2.36) <0.001
Impaired fasting glucose 1.98 (1.89-2.07) <0.001 2.03 (1.94-2.13) <0.001
Dyslipidemia, Tg 1.68 (1.62-1.74) <0.001 1.62 (1.56-1.68) <0.001
Dyslipidemia, HDL 1.54 (1.49-1.60) <0.001 1.49 (1.43-1.55) <0.001
Recovered components (in MetS-recovery vs. MetS-chronic)
Central obesity 0.60 (0.56-0.65) <0.001 0.60 (0.56-0.64) <0.001
High blood pressure 0.46 (0.43-0.49) <0.001 0.47 (0.44-0.50) <0.001
Impaired fasting glucose 0.39 (0.36-0.42) <0.001 0.44 (0.41-0.47) <0.001
Dyslipidemia, Tg 0.59 (0.56-0.62) <0.001 0.60 (0.57-0.63) <0.001
Dyslipidemia, HDL 0.49 (0.45-0.53) <0.001 0.65 (0.62-0.69) <0.001

CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HR, hazard ratio; MetS, metabolic syndrome; Tg, triglycerides.

The base multivariable model included the following variables at the inclusion date: age, sex, low income, Charlson comorbidity index scores, body mass index, and baseline laboratory parameters, including estimated glomerular filtration rate, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, hemoglobin, and the presence of dipstick albuminuria.

a

In addition to the variables included in the base model, the number of present MetS components in the health exam just before the inclusion was adjusted in the model 1. bThe model was same as the model 1 except for the actual measured parameters of MetS criteria being included in the model instead of the number of present components.