Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;50(3):183–196. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2020.50.3.183

Table 3. Univariate analysis of potential risk indicators for the presence of mucositis.

Variable Healthy (n=40) Mucositis (n=29) P value
Age (years) 49.45±12.85 53.5±13.07 0.10
No. of implants 0.02
1 27 (68) 11 (38)
2 8 (20) 9 (31)
≥3 5 (12) 9 (31)
Time since implant insertion 6.2 (5.6/7.1) 5.9 (5.5/6.6) 0.28
Diabetes 0.36
No 39 (98) 27 (93)
Yes 1 (2) 2 (7)
Sex 0.66
Male 16 (40) 14 (48)
Female 24 (60) 15 (52)
Presence of keratinized soft tissue 0.21
No 7 (17) 3 (10)
Yes 33 (83) 26 (90)
Overall periodontal treatment need (PSI ≥3) 0.13
No 23 (58) 21 (72)
Yes 17 (42) 8 (28)
Regular SIT attendance 0.36
No 11 (27) 12 (41)
Yes 29 (73) 17 (59)
Smoking 0.81
No 28 (70) 25 (86)
Yes 12 (30) 4 (14)
Prosthetic usage period in years 0.99
5.0–5.9 16 (40) 17 (59)
6.0–6.9 11 (28) 5 (17)
7.0–7.9 13 (32) 7 (24)
History of periodontitis 0.36
No 36 (90) 22 (76)
Yes 4 (10) 7 (24)

Mean±standard deviation or median (25th/75th percentiles) of numerical variables and the absolute relative frequency of categorical variables are presented separately for patients with and without mucositis. The last column represents the P value of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher exact test. Significant results are highlighted in bold (significance level P<0.05).

SIT: supportive implant therapy.