Table 4. Regression models demonstrating the relationship of FGT with gingival recession.
Factors | Univariate model | Multivariate model | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standardized coefficient β | 95% CI | P | Standardized coefficient β | 95% CI | P | ||
Patient-related factors | |||||||
Age | −0.062 | −0.011 to 0.003 | 0.244 | −0.073 | −0.011 to 0.002 | 0.161 | |
Sex | 0.048 | −0.076 to 0.205 | 0.368 | −0.014 | −0.166 to 0.129 | 0.803 | |
Tooth-related factors | |||||||
Jaw of the tooth | −0.009 | −0.128 to 0.107 | 0.862 | 0.011 | −0.110 to 0.134 | 0.847 | |
Position of the tooth | −0.086 | −0.214 to 0.020 | 0.104 | −0.085 | −0.211 to 0.019 | 0.100 | |
Periodontal factors | |||||||
IGT | −0.002 | −0.204 to 0.197 | 0.976 | 0.021 | −0.167 to 0.250 | 0.698 | |
Orthodontic factors | |||||||
Orthognathic surgery history | 0.051 | −0.059 to 0.175 | 0.331 | 0.044 | −0.070 to 0.169 | 0.419 | |
Inclination of the tooth | 0.202 | 0.007 to 0.021 | <0.001a) | 0.232 | 0.005 to 0.027 | 0.004a) | |
Rotation of the tooth | 0.080 | −0.002 to 0.012 | 0.131 | 0.101 | 0.000 to 0.014 | 0.056 |
FGT: final labial gingival thickness, CI: confidence interval, IGT: initial labial gingival thickness.
a)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05).