Skip to main content
. 2020 May 28;50(3):146–158. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2020.50.3.146

Table 5. Regression models demonstrating the relationship of FBT with gingival recession.

Factors Univariate model Multivariate model
Standardized coefficient β 95% CI P Standardized coefficient β 95% CI P
Patient-related factors
Age −0.062 −0.011 to 0.003 0.244 −0.071 −0.011 to 0.002 0.176
Sex 0.048 −0.076 to 0.205 0.368 −0.011 −0.164 to 0.134 0.839
Tooth-related factors
Jaw of the tooth −0.009 −0.128 to 0.107 0.862 0.026 −0.115 to 0.173 0.692
Position of the tooth −0.086 −0.214 to 0.020 0.104 −0.084 −0.211 to 0.021 0.109
Periodontal factors
IBT −0.033 −0.245 to 0.127 0.536 −0.016 −0.265 to 0.208 0.815
Orthodontic factors
Orthognathic surgery history 0.051 −0.059 to 0.175 0.331 0.041 −0.073 to 0.166 0.442
Inclination of the tooth 0.202 0.007 to 0.021 <0.001a) 0.229 0.005 to 0.027 0.005a)
Rotation of the tooth 0.080 −0.002 to 0.012 0.131 0.103 0.000 to 0.014 0.053

FBT: final labial alveolar bone thickness, CI: confidence interval, IBT: initial labial alveolar bone thickness.

a)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05).