Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 17;23(3):691–706. doi: 10.1111/hex.13049
No. Item Guide questions/description Reported on
Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity
Personal Characteristics
1. Inter viewer/facilitator Which author/s conducted the interview or focus group? Page 4
2. Credentials What were the researcher's credentials? eg PhD, MD Page 4
3. Occupation What was their occupation at the time of the study? Page 4
4. Gender Was the researcher male or female? Page 4
5. Experience and training What experience or training did the researcher have? Page 4
Relationship with participants
6. Relationship established Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? Page 7
7. Participant knowledge of the interviewer What did the participants know about the researcher? eg personal goals, reasons for doing the research Page 7
8. Interviewer characteristics What characteristics were reported about the inter viewer/facilitator? eg Bias, assumptions, reasons, and interests in the research topic Page 7
Domain 2: study design
Theoretical framework
9. Methodological orientation and Theory What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? eg grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis Page 7
Participant selection
10. Sampling How were participants selected? eg purposive, convenience, consecutive, snowball Page 7
11. Method of approach How were participants approached? eg face‐to‐face, telephone, mail, email Page 7
12. Sample size How many participants were in the study? Page 7
13. Non‐participation How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons? Page 7
Setting
14. Setting of data collection Where was the data collected? eg home, clinic, workplace Page 7
15. Presence of non‐participants Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? Page 7
16. Description of sample What are the important characteristics of the sample? eg demographic data, date Page 7
Data collection
17. Interview guide Were questions, prompts, guides provided by the authors? Was it pilot tested? Appendix 2
18. Repeat interviews Were repeat inter views carried out? If yes, how many? Page 7
19. Audio/visual recording Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? Page 7
20. Field notes Were field notes made during and/or after the interview or focus group? Page 7
21. Duration What was the duration of the inter views or focus group? Page 7
22. Data saturation Was data saturation discussed? Page 7
23. Transcripts returned Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or correction? Page 7
Domain 3: analysis and findings
Data analysis
24. Number of data coders How many data coders coded the data? Pages 8
25. Description of the coding tree Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? Appendix 3
26. Derivation of themes Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? Page 8
27. Software What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? Page 8
28. Participant checking Did participants provide feedback on the findings? Page 8
Reporting
29. Quotations presented

Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? eg participant number

*
30. Data and findings consistent Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? *
31. Clarity of major themes Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? *
32. Clarity of minor themes Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? *
*

These items are not applicable, as this is not the study reporting findings from the process evaluation.