No. Item | Guide questions/description | Reported on |
---|---|---|
Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity | ||
Personal Characteristics | ||
1. Inter viewer/facilitator | Which author/s conducted the interview or focus group? | Page 4 |
2. Credentials | What were the researcher's credentials? eg PhD, MD | Page 4 |
3. Occupation | What was their occupation at the time of the study? | Page 4 |
4. Gender | Was the researcher male or female? | Page 4 |
5. Experience and training | What experience or training did the researcher have? | Page 4 |
Relationship with participants | ||
6. Relationship established | Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? | Page 7 |
7. Participant knowledge of the interviewer | What did the participants know about the researcher? eg personal goals, reasons for doing the research | Page 7 |
8. Interviewer characteristics | What characteristics were reported about the inter viewer/facilitator? eg Bias, assumptions, reasons, and interests in the research topic | Page 7 |
Domain 2: study design | ||
Theoretical framework | ||
9. Methodological orientation and Theory | What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? eg grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis | Page 7 |
Participant selection | ||
10. Sampling | How were participants selected? eg purposive, convenience, consecutive, snowball | Page 7 |
11. Method of approach | How were participants approached? eg face‐to‐face, telephone, mail, email | Page 7 |
12. Sample size | How many participants were in the study? | Page 7 |
13. Non‐participation | How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons? | Page 7 |
Setting | ||
14. Setting of data collection | Where was the data collected? eg home, clinic, workplace | Page 7 |
15. Presence of non‐participants | Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? | Page 7 |
16. Description of sample | What are the important characteristics of the sample? eg demographic data, date | Page 7 |
Data collection | ||
17. Interview guide | Were questions, prompts, guides provided by the authors? Was it pilot tested? | Appendix 2 |
18. Repeat interviews | Were repeat inter views carried out? If yes, how many? | Page 7 |
19. Audio/visual recording | Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? | Page 7 |
20. Field notes | Were field notes made during and/or after the interview or focus group? | Page 7 |
21. Duration | What was the duration of the inter views or focus group? | Page 7 |
22. Data saturation | Was data saturation discussed? | Page 7 |
23. Transcripts returned | Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or correction? | Page 7 |
Domain 3: analysis and findings | ||
Data analysis | ||
24. Number of data coders | How many data coders coded the data? | Pages 8 |
25. Description of the coding tree | Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? | Appendix 3 |
26. Derivation of themes | Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? | Page 8 |
27. Software | What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? | Page 8 |
28. Participant checking | Did participants provide feedback on the findings? | Page 8 |
Reporting | ||
29. Quotations presented |
Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? eg participant number |
* |
30. Data and findings consistent | Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? | * |
31. Clarity of major themes | Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? | * |
32. Clarity of minor themes | Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? | * |
These items are not applicable, as this is not the study reporting findings from the process evaluation.