Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;7(2):120–135. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2020009

Table 3. Hippocampal shrinkage rates by hemisphere and diagnoses at baseline and follow-up.

Diagnosis at Baseline
Diagnosis at Follow-up
Hippocampal Contraction ml/year Left Right Left Right
Normal (N) 0.0115 ± 0.0004 (78) 0.0107 ± 0.0004 (78) 0.0124 ± 0.0004 (69) 0.0108 ± 0.0004 (69)
AD (N) - - 0.015# ± 0.002 (7) 0.019# ± 0.002 (7)
MCI (N) 0.020** ± 0.002 (6) 0.020** ± 0.001 (6) 0.016# ± 0.001 (8) 0.010 ±0.001 (8)
Results in Model**
Gender T = −1.23/p = 0.22 T = −2.27/p = 0.03 T = 2.38/p = 0.02 T = −1.93/p = 0.06
Gender x Diagnosis T = 1.65/p = 0.10 T = 2.67/p = 0.01 F = 7.8/ p = 0.001 F = 4.79/p = 0.01
Total dv-negative rate T = 5.81/p < 0.0001 T=5.51/p<0.0001 F=7.1/ p=0.01 F=24.6/ p<0.0001
Diagnosis T = −4.84/p < 0001 T =−5.17/ p < 0.0001 F = 5.7/ p = 0.005 F = 10.9/ p < 0.0001

x: post-hoc p-value < 0.0001; #post-hoc p-value < 0.05; ** Age, interscan interval, education, and TIV were not significant in the model.