Table 3.
Comparison of High/Low Coping Use
| Coping Variable: | Depression M (SD) | Anxiety M (SD) | Depression % Increase | Anxiety % Increase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education and Advocacy | ||||
| Low | 59.54 (11.42)A | 60.77 (10.68)A | ||
| High | 60.79 (9.94)A | 63.96 (10.73)A | 2.10% | 5.25% |
| Detachment | ||||
| Low | 54.72 (8.66)A | 58.45 (10.15)A | ||
| High | 66.70 (8.94)B | 68.51 (9.38)B | 21.89% | 17.21% |
| Drug and Alcohol Use | ||||
| Low | 59.35 (9.79)A | 62.41 (10.40)A | ||
| High | 64.66 (9.11)B | 67.42 (7.79)B | 8.95% | 8.03% |
| Resistance | ||||
| Low | 59.64 (10.78)A | 62.39 (10.57)A | ||
| High | 61.62 (9.95)A | 64.19 (11.97)A | 3.32% | 2.89% |
| Internalization | ||||
| Low | 56.48 (8.75)A | 59.70 (9.53)A | ||
| High | 65.52 (8.50)B | 67.58 (10.10)B | 16.01% | 13.20% |
Note. Low use of a coping strategy was defined as scoring ≤ a 2, or “a little like me” or less; high use of a coping strategy was defined as scoring ≥ a 4, or “often like me” or greater. According to independent samples t tests, means for the low and high groups in each coping category that differ in their subscripts are significantly different from one another.