Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 28;33:11. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00151-y

Table 2.

The ANOVA of the overall weighted scores of CBI-Br (three-factor model) and the burnout (SOHM) between gender and function

Variable PB WB CBa Burnout
Gender (mean ± standard deviation)
 Men (n = 296) 2.11 ± 0.90 2.08 ± 0.86 2.05 ± 0.97 2.08 ± 0.86
 Women (n = 380) 2.68 ± 1.05 2.55 ± 0.97 2.30 ± 0.96 2.55 ± 0.98
 Total (n = 676) 2.43 ± 1.03 2.35 ± 0.95 2.19 ± 0.97 2.34 ± 0.96
F statistic 56.01 43.19 10.91 42.83
p value < 0.001 < 0.001 0.001 < 0.001
Function
 Professors (n = 370) 2.36 ± 0.96 2.30 ± 0.88 2.24 ± 0.96 2.30 ± 0.89
 Academic staff (n = 306) 2.51 ± 1.11 2.40 ± 1.03 2.12 ± 0.99 2.40 ± 1.03
 Total (n = 676) 2.43 ± 1.03 2.35 ± 0.95 2.19 ± 0.97 2.34 ± 0.96
F statistic 3.48 1.88 2.62 1.96
p value 0.063 0.171 0.106 0.162

PB personal burnout, WB work-related burnout, CB colleagues-related burnout

aANOVA with Welch’s correction