Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 17;225(6):1691–1704. doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y

Table 2.

Effects of tDCS on GNGT as revealed by ANCOVA analysis (cf. Fig. 4)

F-Statistics
GNGT Factors Sum Sq Df F value p value pEta²
RT Intercept 2123 1 1.73 0.192 0.024
Baseline values* 20633 1 16.84 0.000*** 0.194
tDCS condition 1186 1 0.97 0.329 0.013
GNGT condition 104 1 0.08 0.772 0.001
Baseline values:tDCS condition 1250 1 1.02 0.316 0.014
Baseline values:GNGT condition 13 1 0.01 0.917 0.000
tDCS condition:GNGT condition 44 1 0.04 0.849 0.000
Baseline values:tDCS condition:GNGT condition 95 1 0.08 0.782 0.001
Residuals 85788 70
dPrime Intercept 0.38 1 1.18 0.281 0.016
Baseline values* 3.09 1 9.58 0.003** 0.120
tDCS condition 0.07 1 0.22 0.643 0.003
GNGT condition 0.02 1 0.07 0.794 0.001
Baseline values:tDCS condition 0.01 1 0.02 0.895 0.000
Baseline values:GNGT condition 0.00 1 0.01 0.930 0.000
tDCS condition:GNGT condition 0.14 1 0.43 0.512 0.006
Baseline values:tDCS condition:GNGT condition 0.16 1 0.48 0.489 0.007
Residuals 22.59 70

** *** Statistical significance when p value < 0.05