Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;9:100058. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100058

Table 1.

Detailed description of different types of conducted adsorption experiments.

Effect of pH Mass of MWCNT (mg) Concentration of MS2 (PFU/mL) NOM type and concentration Concentration of Ca2+ (mmol/L) Analysis
MWCNT mass on MS2 log10 removal 5.2, 7.7 and 8.7 2.5 to 15 106 MS2 PFU assay
SRNOM initial concentration on SRNOM adsorption 5.2, 7.7 and 8.7 15 SRNOM; from 2.5 to 25 mgC/L DOC analysis and liquid chromatography coupled with organic carbon and organic nitrogen detectors (LC-OCD) analysis
initial MS2 concentration on MS2 log10 removal 7.7 15 Increased from 105 to 109 MS2 PFU assay
SRNOM as co-solute on MS2 log10 removal 7.7 15 and 5 106 SRNOM; from 0 to 15 mgC/L MS2 PFU assay
an SRNOM adlayer on MS2 log10 removal 7.7 15 106 (added after 3 h of adsorption with SRNOM) SRNOM; preloading from 0 to 15 mgC/L for 3 h MS2 PFU assay
Ca2+ concentration on MS2 log10 removal in SRNOM co-solute systems 7.7 15 Fixed at 106 SRNOM; 5 mgC/L 0.1, 1.9 and 7.5 MS2 PFU assay
NOM in natural water samples on MS2 log10 removal 7.7 15 Fixed at 106 Tap water, ground water, river water and water from WWTP secondary effluent Actual concentration of water samples MS2 PFU assay and
LC-OCD-OND analysis