Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;6(6):e04007. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04007

Table 2.

Changes from baseline for body composition with the severe and moderate energy restriction interventions of the TEMPO Diet Trial.

Measurement No. Severe Group,
Estimated Marginal Mean
(95% CI)
No. Moderate Group,
Estimated Marginal Mean
(95% CI)
P Valuea
Weight change, kg

24 mo 45 -10.0 (-13.3 to -6.6)b 31 -6.0 (-9.7 to -2.4)b <0.001
36 mo 41 -8.0 (-11.7 to -4.4)b 31 -4.9 (-8.9 to -0.9)b 0.008

Weight change, % of baseline
24 mo 45 -11.2 (-14.9 to -7.6)b 31 -6.7 (-10.7 to -2.7)b <0.001
36 mo 41 -9.0 (-12.9 to -5.1)b 31 -5.5 (-9.8 to -1.2)f 0.012

Body mass index change, kg/m2c
24 mo 45 -3.79 (-5.08 to -2.49)b 31 -2.25 (-3.67 to -0.84)b 0.001
36 mo 41 -2.94 (-4.37 to -1.51)b 31 -1.61 (-3.17 to -0.04)e 0.007

Lean tissues
Whole-body lean mass change, kgd
24 mo 45 -2.9 (-3.9 to -1.9)b 31 -1.9 (-3.1 to -0.8)b 0.02
36 mo 41 -2.8 (-3.9 to -1.6)b 31 -2.0 (-3.2 to -0.7)b 0.04

Muscle strength change, kg
Dominant hand
24 mo 44 -1.91 (-3.70 to -0.13)e 31 -3.21 (-5.24 to -1.18)b 0.16
36 mo 41 -2.25 (-4.02 to -0.47)f 31 -4.20 (-6.12 to -2.28)b 0.03

Non-dominant hand
24 mo 45 -2.33 (-4.09 to -0.58)f 31 -3.07 (-5.04 to -1.11)b 0.30
36 mo 41 -2.80 (-4.68 to -0.91)b 31 -2.81 (-4.84 to -0.77)f 0.92

Bone mineral density, g/cm2d
Total hip change
24 mo 45 -0.030 (-0.046 to -0.015)b 30 -0.007 (-0.025 to 0.011) <0.001
36 mo 41 -0.038 (-0.054 to -0.021)b 30 -0.019 (-0.038 to -0.001)e 0.02

Femoral neck change
24 mo 45 -0.046 (-0.067 to -0.025)b 30 -0.039 (-0.063 to 0.015)b 0.36
36 mo 41 -0.063 (-0.085 to -0.040)b 30 -0.045 (-0.070 to -0.020)b 0.047

Lumbar spine change
24 mo 45 -0.046 (-0.065 to -0.028)b 31 -0.042 (-0.063 to -0.021)b 0.31
36 mo 41 -0.044 (-0.065 to -0.022)b 31 -0.048 (-0.073 to -0.024)b 0.77

Whole-body change
24 mo 45 -0.015 (-0.041 to 0.011) 31 -0.005 (-0.035 to 0.026) 0.06
36 mo 41 -0.021 (-0.051 to 0.008) 31 0.002 (-0.031 to 0.036) 0.007

Fat mass and distribution
Waist circumference change, cm
24 mo 45 -9.4 (-12.7 to -6.2)b 31 -5.1 (-8.8 to -1.5)f <0.001
36 mo 41 -7.4 (-10.8 to -3.9)b 31 -4.3 (-8.1 to -0.4)e 0.04

Hip circumference change, cm
24 mo 45 -6.6 (-9.1 to -4.2)b 31 -4.7 (-7.4 to -1.9)b 0.005
36 mo 41 -5.9 (-8.5 to -3.2)b 31 -4.4 (-7.3 to -1.5)b 0.046

Ratio of waist to hip circumference changeg
24 mo 45 -0.020 (-0.062 to 0.022) 31 0.003 (-0.043 to 0.050) 0.02
36 mo 41 -0.030 (-0.075 to 0.014) 31 0.006 (-0.042 to 0.054) 0.005

Whole-body fat mass change, kgd
24 mo 45 -5.9 (-8.1 to -3.7)b 31 -3.3 (-5.8 to -0.9)f <0.001
36 mo 41 -4.8 (-6.9 to -2.6)b 31 -3.1 (-5.6 to -0.7)f 0.001

Abdominal adipose tissue change, cm3
Subcutaneous
24 mo 40 -2341 (-3161 to -1520)b 29 -1551 (-2454 to -647)b 0.01
36 mo 35 -1986 (-2900 to -1072)b 26 -1477 (-2504 to -451)f 0.16

Visceral
24 mo 40 -1647 (-2199 to -1094)b 30 -999 (-1594 to -403)b 0.001
36 mo 35 -1287 (-1868 to -705)b 26 -866 (-1502 to -229)f 0.03

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; mo, months; TEMPO, Type of Energy Manipulation for Promoting optimum metabolic health and body composition in Obesity.

Bolded P values in the right-hand column represent P values that are less than 0.05.

a

P values for comparison between the severe and moderate interventions at each time point.

b

P < 0.001 versus baseline for that group. For within-group comparisons between follow-up and baseline values, a repeated-measures linear mixed model was used.

c

Calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

d

Measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

e

P < 0.05 versus baseline for that group. For within-group comparisons between follow-up and baseline values, a repeated-measures linear mixed model was used.

f

P < 0.01 versus baseline for that group. For within-group comparisons between follow-up and baseline values, a repeated-measures linear mixed model was used.

g

Calculated as waist circumference divided by hip circumference.