Intervention design workshops: To align intervention design parameters with key theoretical principles, recent empirical evidence and national/international best practice; and refine formative research questions and methods |
-
•
Wide age range and multiple referral routes can maximise coverage, impact and buy-in from schools
-
•
Delivery in schools can reduce external structural barriers to accessing psychological interventions, but other constraints may be faced due to daily timetable (e.g., 40-min class periods), vacations and exam periods
-
•
Challenges of implementing systematic mental health screening in schools require brief, ecologically valid assessment tools, focused on symptom-based/functional dimensions rather than discrete diagnostic categories
-
•
Transdiagnostic ‘elements-based’ intervention design may have particular utility in designing parsimonious treatment packages in low-resource contexts
-
•
Public health impact may be strengthened through a stepped care approach that delivers a low-intensity intervention across diverse presentations, followed by a high-intensity treatment for non-responders that is tailored to specific problem profiles (e.g., by selecting/sequencing discrete treatment modules)
-
•
A relatively brief psychological intervention, focused on ‘here and now’ strategies, may be favoured by adolescents and is consistent with the requirements of a low-intensity first-line intervention
-
•
Simplified decision rules are needed to facilitate delivery by non-specialists
-
•
Digital delivery platforms and parental involvement should be explored further
|
Scoping literature reviews: To align intervention design parameters and decisions with the global evidence base |
-
•
Emerging support for transdiagnostic mechanisms in onset, maintenance and treatment of common mental health problems
-
•
Substantial support for stress-coping principles and their applications in cognitive and behavioural therapies, including self-help approaches
-
•
Self-help is most effective when provided with guidance, which may be delivered in various formats
-
•
Adolescents' may prefer practical coping strategies that fit with developmental drive for self-determination
-
•
Stepped care models, linked to measurement feedback systems, can maximise effectiveness and efficiency of treatments by optimising resource allocation
-
•
Task-sharing approaches with non-specialists have been effective in a growing number of psychological treatment trials, particularly in low-resource contexts, when accompanied by adequate supervision
-
•
Peer-led supervision approaches have potential utility as part of task sharing
|
Local stakeholder interviews: To obtain contextually sensitive evidence about types and causes of common adolescent mental health problems; adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies; knowledge and attitudes towards help-seeking; and preferences and priorities for psychological support |
-
•
Adolescent help seeking is often driven by psychosocial stressors rather than overt psychiatric symptoms
-
•
Adolescents prioritise concrete, practical tips for problem resolution
-
•
Self-help is largely unfamiliar as a concept among the target population; face-to-face guidance may help to explain materials and strengthen engagement
-
•
Digital technology is appealing for adolescents (especially use of films/animations), but there is limited access to personal devices and distribution of handsets could arouse suspicion from parents, teachers and peers
-
•
Adolescents are generally opposed to parental/teacher involvement in counselling, whereas significant adults wish to be kept informed about problems and progress
-
•
School counsellors are less likely to have strong stigmatising connotations, relative to psychiatrists and other clinic-based mental health service providers
-
•
Mental health literacy of staff and support for service implementation can vary greatly between schools
|
Relevance mapping: To identify evidence-based practice elements from global research literature that can be applied most widely to presenting problems in the target population |
-
•
Relative to other individual practice elements, problem solving offers the most parsimonious coverage to the range of presenting problems likely to occur in the target population
-
•
This includes a substantial proportion of psychosocial problems that do not correspond precisely to standardised mental health symptom inventories, but may nevertheless be associated with elevated distress and functional impairment
-
•
The full international literature, as well as the subset of studies in non-Western contexts, all showed similar support for problem solving
|