Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;7:100073. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2020.100073

Table 2.

WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations on Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Natural course
 Approximately 30% of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are expected to worsen, but 30% may improve with conservative measures
There are predictive signs/symptoms that they will worsen:
 • Dural sac cross-sectional area <50 mm2
 • Presence of radicular symptoms and back pain
 • Presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or scoliosis
 • Symptom duration >1 year
Radiologic diagnosis
 MRI is the most appropriate noninvasive test for the diagnosis of LSS and the second is CT scan. CT myelography is appropriate if MRI is contraindicated or inconclusive
There is no correlation between clinical symptoms or function with the presence of anatomic narrowing of the spinal canal on MRI, CT, or myelo-CT
Qualitative radiologic criteria describe adequately spinal stenosis in central, lateral, or foraminal stenosis
There are some radiologic signs that describe instability:
 • Direct signs on functional radiograms
 • Indirect signs on MRI and CT such as Modic changes, end-plate edema, extended discal vacuum, traction spurs, synovial cysts, annular tears, spondylolisthesis, and “facet fluid sign”
Electrophysiological diagnosis
 Routine electrophysiological tests (EMG, nerve conduction study, F-wave response, H-reflex, SSEP, MEP) have no diagnostic value for LSS
Electrophysiological tests do not predict the outcome of patients with LSS

WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computed tomography; EMG, electromyography; SSEP, somatosensory evoked potential; MEP, motor evoked potential.