Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 17;4(12):2640–2643. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001984

Table 1.

Antibiotic exposures and CMV reactivation

Yes, n No, n HR (95% CI) P
Model using antibiotic exposures by day +14
 Fluoroquinolones (yes vs no) 193 20 1.53 (0.69-3.43) .30
 Third-generation or higher cephalosporins (yes vs no) 142 71 0.72 (0.39-1.32) .28
 Vancomycin (yes vs no) 120 93 1.97 (1.11-3.51) .02
 Piperacillin-tazobactam (yes vs no) 44 169 0.90 (0.51-1.58) .71
 Carbapenems (yes vs no) 47 166 1.33 (0.78-2.26) .29
 Metronidazole (yes vs no) 35 178 0.92 (0.51-1.68) .79
 Clindamycin (yes vs no) 28 185 0.53 (0.24-1.19) .12
 ATG during conditioning (yes vs no) 36 177 0.62 (0.32-1.20) .16
 Grade 2-4 acute GVHD (time varying) 100 113 1.69 (1.05-2.73) .03
 Ganciclovir/valganciclovir (time varying) 40 173 0.45 (0.22-0.93) .03
 Donor: UCB vs MSD 146 67 0.19 (0.04-0.97) .05
 UCB × time (d) interaction 1.05 (1.01-1.09) .01
Model using antibiotic exposures by day +100
 Fluoroquinolones (time varying) 200 13 1.56 (0.62-3.93) .34
 Third-generation or higher cephalosporins (time varying) 172 41 1.21 (0.62-2.39) .58
 Vancomycin (time varying) 161 52 1.87 (0.99-3.54) .05
 Piperacillin-tazobactam (time varying) 65 148 0.78 (0.46-1.31) .34
 Carbapenems (time varying) 80 133 1.33 (0.82-2.14) .25
 Metronidazole (time varying) 57 156 0.64 (0.37-1.10) .11
 Clindamycin (time varying) 32 181 0.56 (0.26-1.18) .13
 ATG during conditioning (yes vs no) 36 177 0.62 (0.32-1.19) .15
 Grade 2-4 acute GVHD (time varying) 100 113 1.69 (1.04-2.73) .03
 Ganciclovir/valganciclovir (time varying) 40 173 0.43 (0.21-0.89) .02
 Donor: UCB vs MSD 146 67 0.18 (0.04-0.90) .04
 UCB × time (d) interaction 1.05 (1.02-1.09) .01

The number of patients in each category is shown; for antibiotics, this is the number of patients exposed by day +14 or day +100, respectively. However, for time-varying variables, exposed patients were not “at risk” for the entire follow-up period.