Table B3.
Comparison of the Range and Variation in the Share of Elderly for CPOAT and LCR as Old-Age Threshold, 2012.
| Maximum value | Country with maximum | Minimum value | Country with minimum | Range | Variance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asia | ||||||
| • CPOAT | 13.86 | Japan | 0.52 | United Arab Emirates | 13.34 | 7.08 |
| • LCR | 13.48 | Georgia | 0.40 | United Arab Emirates | 13.08 | 5.27 |
| Europe | ||||||
| • CPOAT | 18.56 | Latvia | 7.37 | Ireland | 11.19 | 7.53 |
| • LCR | 17.18 | Lithuania | 7.13 | Netherlands | 10.05 | 5.93 |
| Asia and Europe | ||||||
| • CPOAT | 18.56 | Latvia | 0.52 | United Arab Emirates | 18.04 | 20.05 |
| • LCR | 17.18 | Lithuania | 0.40 | United Arab Emirates | 16.78 | 18.56 |
Note. CPOAT = comparative prospective old-age threshold; LCR = life course ratio.